Vehicle recalls
30,429 recall campaigns from NHTSA, newest first. Decode a VIN to see the ones for your car.
Vehicle recalls per year
Most recalled systems
Latest recalls
The cab opening for the windshield may not have been built to correct specifications. As a result, the height opening may be too large for proper windshield retention.
The retaining screws on the fuel bowl have the potential to loosen, allowing seepage of gasoline from the carburetor.
There IS a possibility of premature hose deterioration due to high fuel oxidation levels which would allow fuel seepage and fumes to enter the vehicle.
The fuel tank cap vent system could fail to vent properly. If the vent hole in the cap becomes blocked during vehicle operation, a vacuum "lock" condition could result.
An operational amplifier in the axle controllers on the involved vehicles may deviate from specifications. There may also be an opening in a solder connection between the printed circuit board and the negative terminal of the capacitor.…
The main door striker pocket may not be positioned in the door jamb so that the lock bolt projects a minimum of one-quarter inch into the striker pocket when the door IS fully closed. Anything less than one-quarter inch engagement may…
Certain welds attaching the landing gear transverse supporting bracketry to the main landing gear attaching bracket may have been applied with poor welding techniques. Because of this misapplication of welding, this bracketry can become…
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 209, "seat belt assemblies" in that the right hand seat belt retractors used at both the driver and front passenger seat positions may have been…
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 209, "seat belt assemblies", in that they do not have the capability of fitting certain adult passengers when the seat IS in the full forward position.
Certain transverse radius rod brackets, on the involved vehicles, attached to the top of the front axle, may have been improperly manufactured. This improper manufacturing could result in abnormal stress loads being imposed on one or both…
The fuel pipe brackets mounted in the cylinder head rear stud have been misaligned on the involved vehicles. As a result, the nylon fuel feed pipe may sustain chafing and feed pipe damage.
Some of these vehicles were manufactured with weak rear brake control inner lever arm and pivot shafts. As a result, excessive pressure will be needed on the brake pedal to stop the vehicle.
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 123, "motorcycle controls and displays". These vehicles were delivered with fuel shut-off valves which do not have the valve positions ("on", "off" and…
Due to location of the back of the cab reflector being above the 60-inch maximum height, reflectors were to be installed on the rear frame crossmember. Some of these trucks were delivered without the frame mounted reflectors. As a result…
The wrong operational amplifier was installed in the controller on the involved vehicles. If a certain capacitor in the controller should fail, the brakes on the axle on which the controller IS located would fail. The brake warning light…
Certain structural welds attaching the king pin to the king pin mounting structure may have been omitted or applied with poor welding techniques. This could allow the king pin to loosen from it"s supporting structure.
The hex head bolt that connects the main wiring harness to terminal #30 may not have been tightened to the proper torque.
The gross axle weight rating (gawr) on the involved vehicles may have been incorrectly calculated and thus these vehicles may have been equipped with rear tires having an insufficient ply rating for the intended load requirement. As a…
The involved vehicles do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 217, "bus window retention and release". The window exits are of insufficient size and the emergency exit location and operating instructions are improperly…
The involved vehicles do not contain an emergency stop control for emergency stopping of the vehicle. This emergency stop control IS necessary to prevent engine overspeed and to stop the engine in case of a fuel malfunction.
The high pressure power steering hose may have been routed too close to the exhaust manifold. As a result, the heat from the manifold could damage the hose.
In the event of a frontal impact, fuel leakage may occur at the fuel line to fuel pump connection in the engine compartment. These vehicles fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 301, "fuel system integrity".
An axle "no brake" condition could result from an eaton controller internal electrical malfunction. This condition may cause the anti-wheel lock valve solenoid to be continuously energized and prevent the brakes from being applied on one…
The involved vehicles have brake pedals whose bending strength may not withstand a panic or severe braking application.
The bolts that anchor forward mounting brackets for the rear springs may loosen.
Vehicles were built with wire connectors that fail to allow the current flow needed to support the electronic control of the engine ignition.
The l.p. Gas supply line to the water heater may contact the bottom side of the kitchen sink base drawer. The action of opening and closing the drawer may cause chafing to the l.p. Gas line which could rupture the line.
Due to overstress, the hose joints of the right overaxle fuel pipe and left overaxle pressure pipes may break allowing fuel leakage.
The rear wheel bearings on the involved vehicles, may have received an inadequate amount of lubrication. This condition would initially cause the roller bearings to develop a rumbling noise.
Due to the high fuel flow rate in the fuel system, conditions of extreme altitude, temperatures, or fuel contamination, may lead to the formation of fuel vapor bubbles.