Vehicle recalls
30,429 recall campaigns from NHTSA, newest first. Decode a VIN to see the ones for your car.
Vehicle recalls per year
Most recalled systems
Latest recalls
Vehicles may be susceptable to heavy rusting in structurally significant areas of the undercarriage. This condition may impair the attachment to the body of: 1) the front upper control arms, 2) the front cross member to which the front…
The involved vehicles were assembled with the left front brake tube retaining clip missing. The absence of a retaining clip may allow the brake tube to rub against the shock absorber, causing wear on the tube and, eventually, loss of brake…
Holes drilled in the rear axle yokes to balance them could cause a failure of the yoke.
The retaining pin for the brake control knob has been misaligned (off the center line of the valve plunger hole). This causes the knob to be overstressed at the retaining pin hole area causing it to separate from the valve.
Due to a deficiency in material strength, the front engine support brackets on the involved vehicles may develop cracks that could lead to bracket failure. This would cause the engine to drop down into the radiator, damaging the shroud…
The involved trucks have pitman arms with timing marks and serrations located 8 degrees out of proper alignment. When the chassis IS raised to the maximum condition with the wheels suspended or dropped into a deep hole, the pitman arm and…
The involved trucks do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 208, "occupant crash protection", in that the extended rider"s seat was not equipped with a seat belt as required.
Some vehicles equipped with power brake boosters have front and rear shells that may have been improperly joined. Improperly joined booster shells may separate either partially or completely during brake application.
The right hand front canopy cab mounting bracket interferes with the right hand brake chamber on the steering axle when in a certain degree turn and severe bumping IS present.
Under certain jarring conditions the rear hatch type door may open without advance warning.
The cruise command actuation chain may catch on the throttle linkage, causing the throttle to remain in a partially open position.
The actuation chain of the cruise command could catch on the throttle linkage. This can cause the throttle to remain in a partially open position.
The wrong size cup was included in the wheel cylinder repair kit. The oversized cup may allow a fluid bypass, resulting in a loss of brake fluid.
A protective cover was omitted from the speed control unit. Without this cover, a bead chain which connects the throttle linkage to the servo assembly could become entangled in the linkage or other engine components. If the chain becomes…
Two types of firestone tire rim bases and matching side rings were in use. During installation, tire rim bases and side rings may not have been correctly matched.
A protective metal cover was omitted from the speed control unit. Without this cover, a bead chain which connects the throttle linkage to the servo assembly could become entangled in the linkage or other engine components. If the chain…
Chassis on the involved buses were labeled incorrectly with a gvwr of 10,000 pounds that does not meet the requirements of federal regulation part 567.4(g). This states that the gvwr should not be less than the sum of the unloaded vehicle…
During vehicle operation, the pop top could loosen from its anchor due to wind pressure. It could open and separate entirely from the vehicle.
Two protruding screws in the tire mold caused depressions in the sidewall which can develop cracks. Cracks may lead to a rupture in the tire.
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 210, "seat belt assembly anchorages", in that the door frame-to-body center pillar interlock on the front seat belts of these vehicles may be misaligned.
The bolts for the clamp on the drag link may not have been tightened to specifications on the involved vehicles. The looseness can result in wear on the threaded connection between the ball joint and the drag link.
The front left upper control arm nuts may not have been securely tightened. The nuts may loosen and come off and with continued driving the control arm front bolt may work its way out of position or become displaced.
The primary circuit connection, which provides primary electrical power to the engine, could deteriorate due to high current draw produced by builder-installed equipment.
Tires may develop separation in the lower sidewall area and fail to comply with the endurance requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 109, "new pneumatic tires". This will lead to loss of air pressure.
Ball studs were improperly heat-treated and constructed from an alternate material. Cracks can develop and ball studs may break.
The involved trucks do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 209, "seat belt assemblies", in that the first purchaser usage and maintenance instructions for the seat belt assembly was omitted from the operator"s manual…
The involved school buses do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 210, "seat belt assembly anchorages", in that the seat belt anchorages were not spaced 6.5 inches apart.
Upon applying the brakes, the vehicle stopping distance IS approximately 10 percent longer than IS permitted by federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 105, "hydraulic brake systems".
The locking bolt that engages the steering gear shaft groove does not perform adequately. The potential exists for the pitman arm to slide away from the steering gear shaft.
Under certain operating road conditions, the power cables contained in a tube between the batteries and the engine can move freely. This movement could cause the main power cable to chafe, leading to an electrical short.