Vehicle recalls
30,429 recall campaigns from NHTSA, newest first. Decode a VIN to see the ones for your car.
Vehicle recalls per year
Most recalled systems
Latest recalls
The adhesive bond that attaches the t-bar roof glass panels to their frames may deteriorate. Complete failure of the adhesive system can result in separation of the glass panel from the vehicle.
Abnormal pressure pulses generated during engine operation may lead to cracking and fragmenting of the fan blades.
Some of these vehicles were manufactured with weak rear brake control inner lever arm and pivot shafts. As a result, excessive pressure will be needed on the brake pedal to stop the vehicle.
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 123, "motorcycle controls and displays". These vehicles were delivered with fuel shut-off valves which do not have the valve positions ("on", "off" and…
Due to location of the back of the cab reflector being above the 60-inch maximum height, reflectors were to be installed on the rear frame crossmember. Some of these trucks were delivered without the frame mounted reflectors. As a result…
The wrong operational amplifier was installed in the controller on the involved vehicles. If a certain capacitor in the controller should fail, the brakes on the axle on which the controller IS located would fail. The brake warning light…
The involved tires fail to meet the endurance requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 109, "new pneumatic tires". The reduced endurance capacity could lead to tread separation under normal driving conditions.
The involved jacks may fail in service when off center lifting of loads in excess of 2700 lbs. IS attempted on the saddle.
Certain structural welds attaching the king pin to the king pin mounting structure may have been omitted or applied with poor welding techniques. This could allow the king pin to loosen from it"s supporting structure.
The hex head bolt that connects the main wiring harness to terminal #30 may not have been tightened to the proper torque.
The gross axle weight rating (gawr) on the involved vehicles may have been incorrectly calculated and thus these vehicles may have been equipped with rear tires having an insufficient ply rating for the intended load requirement. As a…
The involved vehicles do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 217, "bus window retention and release". The window exits are of insufficient size and the emergency exit location and operating instructions are improperly…
The involved vehicles do not contain an emergency stop control for emergency stopping of the vehicle. This emergency stop control IS necessary to prevent engine overspeed and to stop the engine in case of a fuel malfunction.
The high pressure power steering hose may have been routed too close to the exhaust manifold. As a result, the heat from the manifold could damage the hose.
In the event of a frontal impact, fuel leakage may occur at the fuel line to fuel pump connection in the engine compartment. These vehicles fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 301, "fuel system integrity".
An axle "no brake" condition could result from an eaton controller internal electrical malfunction. This condition may cause the anti-wheel lock valve solenoid to be continuously energized and prevent the brakes from being applied on one…
The involved vehicles have brake pedals whose bending strength may not withstand a panic or severe braking application.
The bolts that anchor forward mounting brackets for the rear springs may loosen.
Vehicles were built with wire connectors that fail to allow the current flow needed to support the electronic control of the engine ignition.
The involved tires fail to meet the endurance requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 119, "new pneumatic tires for vehicles other than passenger cars". The premature failure IS due to tread separation under adverse…
The involved tires fail to meet the high speed requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 109, "new pneumatic tires". Premature failure could occur under adverse conditions of overload, underinflation, or excessive speed.
The l.p. Gas supply line to the water heater may contact the bottom side of the kitchen sink base drawer. The action of opening and closing the drawer may cause chafing to the l.p. Gas line which could rupture the line.
The involved jacks may fail to lift any weight or may lift specified weight but not be able to maintain it in suspension.
Due to overstress, the hose joints of the right overaxle fuel pipe and left overaxle pressure pipes may break allowing fuel leakage.
The rear wheel bearings on the involved vehicles, may have received an inadequate amount of lubrication. This condition would initially cause the roller bearings to develop a rumbling noise.
Due to the high fuel flow rate in the fuel system, conditions of extreme altitude, temperatures, or fuel contamination, may lead to the formation of fuel vapor bubbles.
The outermost input bearing could fail due to insufficient lubrication. Additionally, the countershaft bore plug has a tendency to move out of the bore in the transmission housing. The result IS loss of lubricant in the auxiliary…
The air pipe and fuel line pipe may contact each other and result in chafing of the fuel rail.
The involved vehicles do not conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 208, "occupant crash protection". No seat belts were installed.
The involved vehicles may have been manufactured with incorrect pinch clamp draw bolt drilling in the spring eye mounting brackets of the single drive suspension assembly. The pinch clamp draw bolts could become loose and the spring eye…