1982 Chevrolet C20
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Chevrolet › C20 › 1982
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1982 Chevrolet C20. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
2 recalls name the 1982 Chevrolet C20. Newest first.
Certain honeywell fram racing brand HP4 and HP8 oil filters that were manufactured from may 25, 2006, through september 14, 2007, and sold for use as replacement equipment for vehicles list above. the affected filters are marked with a date code a61451 through a72571 sequentially. the date code and part number appear on the filter housing. fram racing…
This condition may cause inadequate sealing and loss of engine oil, possibly resulting in a fire.
Honeywell will replace the affected oil filters free of charge. the recall began during november 2007. owners can contact fram customer service toll-free at 1-800-890-2075.
The rear axle shafts received improper heat treatment during manufacture. The shaft may break and the tire and wheel assembly could disengage from the vehicle.
Dealer will replace both rear axle shaft assemblies, if necessary, free of charge.
The driver's lap/shoulder seat belt release latch spring broke which makes the seat belt inoperative. please explain. *ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
There is no summary currently available
Summary:some 1981-86 trucks with 7.4L engines and cast iron exhaustmanifolds may experience a condition where an exhaust leak developsbetween the manifold and the cylinder head mating surface causing a noisecondition. Most of the reports (and all of the injuries and themanifold fire) are from the P30 motorhome chassis.gm states that a warpedor cracked manifold would permit small amounts of exhaust gas leakagegenerally resulting in noticeable noise and fumes.the exhaust manifoldsare susceptible to extreme heat conditions (such as operating under severeengine/vehicular load conditions and high ambient temperatures).themotorhome application IS particularly susceptible to this alleged defectsince the vehicle IS nearly always at or near the gvwr of the vehicle.thefew number of reports received by odi for a problem which began 8 years agosuggests that the defect either occurs infrequently or IS not perceived asa significant safety hazard.the service bulletin was issued to identifythe high temperature problem and provide a remedy against reoccurrence.===
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.