2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer Ext 370
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Chevrolet › Trailblazer Ext 370 › 2006
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer Ext 370. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
While driving on a smooth hi-way (no vibrations) the low beam headlights went off. I switched to hi beams and pulled off the road at first opportunity. When I switched back to low beams and they worked perfectly. This has happened 4 times in the 11 years of ownership, twice in one week. could never induce the problem.
I was driving on the and right in the middle of traffic and the car just shut off . I try to restart and it start up when I try to proceed it shut off and would not start back up at all.
Driving on freeway at a cruise control speed of 70 mph without any warning lights or malfunctions with the truck, white smoke was noted from behind the truck. smoke immediately became worse and truck was pulled off on side of road. smoke was noted coming from under front hood as well. driver then saw flames coming up driver side window. driver ran from vehicle and it was consumed in fire. the whole vehicle was a fire bomb and destroyed. No injury was sustained by driver as of next day except to say shock and emotional trauma. Driver side door switch for safety recall of possible fire was done and serviced on april 2015. truck was in the shop the previous day for a tie rod repair, oil change, and tire rotation. mechanic said the truck looked in good shape without any problems noted on the vehicle. I have pictures on my phone of a ball of fire that was the truck.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 14v755000 (visibility) and stated that the part was not available within a reasonable time frame to schedule the recall repair. the dealer did not give a specific date for when the part would become available. The manufacturer could not provide an estimated date for when the vehicle would receive the recall repair. The contact was not experiencing a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. The contact stated that while driving approximately 35 mph, the headlights became inoperable without warning. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the contact was informed that the hdm module needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired however, the failure recurred. The contact mentioned that the failure recurred several times. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v519000 (exterior lighting) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 125,000. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. While the vehicle was stopped at a red light, the headlights failed to illuminate. The failure recurred twice. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 126,000.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. The contact stated that nhtsa campaign number: 14v755000 (exterior lighting) exceeded a reasonable amount of time for repair. The dealer stated that parts were unavailable for the repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the delay and stated that the remedy was not available. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact did not experience a failure related to the recall; however, the check engine warning light illuminated. The failure mileage was 110,000.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. While operating the vehicle, the fuel gauge would erroneously indicate that the fuel tank was empty. After restarting the vehicle, the fuel gauge would provide an accurate fuel reading before displaying empty again. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 71,800.
Driving on the highway traveling about 60. When all of a sudden my truck shut down, thought my foot had got off the peddle but was still on the gas. Put my hazards on and prayed I wasn't going to get smashed by traffic. Then my check engine light came on. And the second engine light came on. As I pull to side of road stop the car put it in park. And tried to start it and all it did was crank and not turn over like I was out of gas. Did research on conditions and it came back default ignition switch. This has just been a nightmare. Only to arrive at chevy. And look my vin number up and said your vin doesn't pull up any recalls? Hun you got to be kidding me right. Clearly I thought recalls from a certain yr to a ending year IS supposed to be handled? I don't know what's going on but please help fix this horrible what could have been tragic situation. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer ext 370. While driving at various speeds and while idling, the fuel gauge fluctuated from empty to full continuously and the check engine warning indicator illuminated. The failure recurred numerous times. The vehicle was taken to a dealer. The technician diagnosed that the fuel level sensor failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 113,762. updated 4/16/15*cn updated 9/29/2017*cn
The headlights while driving will cut off. I have tried replacing headlights with no success. I saw an article about a recall on my car pertaining to headlights. when the article states you guys where told in an email, I don't see that recall on your page. please contact me with information to fix this problem. also, my stability control IS not working. The light keeps coming on. *tr
This vehicle was in a rear to rear accident on 06/04/13. Every since the accident the rear has been down and it was taken to serra chevrolet in bartlett, tn on 09/16/13. they determine that the rear air springs was not airing up and was not caused by the accident. the vehicle was returned to me on 09/19/13 by the collision repair shop. on 09/19/13 the vehicle was taken back to serra chevrolet in bartlett, tn and droped off for the early bird. that friday 09/20/13, I was advised that the vehicle rear compressor needed to be replaced as no psi was engaging in the rear air springs. I advised them okay and to go ahead and complete the job. they advised me that my vehicle would be ready that afternoon. call received at 3:42 pm on 09/20/13 advising that my vehicle would not be ready on 09/20/13, but would be ready by monday 09/23/13 around 11:00 am. I advised him (david lane) that I was without transportation and that I had toddler that was sick and needed transportation. he stated he did not have any vehicles that he could loan me. on monday 09/23/13, since I had not received a call at (11:00 am the promise time) I called at 12:30 pm, to check on the vehicle. at that time, I was advised that my vehicle was ready and that I could come and pick it up. I arrive to pick up the vehicle on 09/23/13 at 1:48 pm and paid $885.39. I left and took possession of my vehicle. on 09/24/13, when leaving work I noticed that my rear end was down again and I immediately called serra chevrolet and left message for david lane. he returned my call on 09/25/13 and asked that I bring the vehicle in on 09/26/13 by 8;00 am. I returned the vehicle on 09/26/13 at the time asked. An hour and a half later I was advised that the air shocks had pin holes in them and that they really needed to be replaced. he stated that this would be $551.00 in addition. I asked if the *js
The main power window and door lock switch on drivers door short circuited and caught fire. *tr
Fuel gauge quit working. *tt
Tl*the contact owns a 2005 chevrolet trailblazer. The contact noticed that the instrument panel including the speedometer, fuel gauge and oil pressure were inoperable, causing them to fluctuate and not remain at a constant point. The contact was unable to determine what speed he was traveling, how much fuel was in the vehicle, or how much oil was currently in the vehicle. Also the rear blower motor was inoperable. The dealer was notified who informed the contact that the vehicle was no longer under warranty. The manufacturer was contacted who advised the contact to take the vehicle to a dealer for a diagnostic test the vehicle had not been repaired or diagnosed. The current mileages were approximately 93,000 and the failure mileages were approximately 50,000. The vin was unavailable.
Checking fuel indicator started to be stuck on below empty causing me to run out of gas on a few occasions. and from my understanding this has been a flaw in gm trucks for sometime now. and the cost for the repair IS over $500.00. these vehicles cost too much money to have these types of problems and the dealer not think it IS there responsibility to correct. *Tr
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
On August 15, 2012 General Motors (GM) announced a regional recall action (12V-406) involving model year (MY) 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Buick Rainier, Isuzu Ascender and MY2005-2007 SAAB 9-7x vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the salt belt states of Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. The recall remedy requires the inspection and repair or replacement of the master power window switch, which GM refers to as a driver door module (DDM). At the same time, GM implemented a special coverage program to replace failed DDMs for vehicles registered outside of these states. ODI was not satisfied with GM's exclusion of non-salt belt vehicles and continued its investigation. On June 13, 2013, GM submitted a related recall notification (13V-248) to reclassify the initial special coverage program into a safety recall for vehicles that were not previously repaired under special coverage.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Engineering Analysis EA12-004 on June 11, 2012 to further investigate allegations of DDM thermal incidents in model year (MY) 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer vehicles. Thermal incidents involve cases where fire-related events such as smoke and melt are present. ODI has received 170 reports alleging a thermal event occurred. Complainants stated that the DDM melted and in some cases produced odor and/or smoke. Fourteen of these incidents led to a fire where visible flames were reported or the damage extended significantly beyond the DDM. In addition to the 170 reports listed above, ODI received 63 reports alleging the DDM acted erratically or became inoperative. In response to ODI's Information Request (IR), GM provided 619 unique consumer complaints that related to the alleged problem. Seventy-seven of those reports led to a fire with flame, and 4 reported injuries of smoke inhalation and/or slight burns from contact with hot switches. GM also submitted 20,400 warranty claims for replacement of the DDM, most of which involved inoperative switches. The problem condition is caused by fluids, such as rain water, entering the driver's door module and subsequently causing corrosion that could result in an electrical short in the printed circuit board. A short may cause the power door lock and power window switches to function intermittently or become inoperative. However, the electrical short may also cause overheating that could melt components of the door module, producing odor, smoke or in some cases fire with flame. The circuit board was redesigned and GM implemented the new design into vehicle production on May 14, 2007. All failures cited above occurred in vehicles produced before this build date (i.e., with the original design DDM). GM also reported that all MY 2006-2007 GMT360/370 platform vehicles and MY 2005 SAAB 9-7x vehicles utilized the same DDM and therefore ODI expanded the subject population to include these vehicles.This investigation is closed on the basis of GM's announcement of safety recalls 12V-406 and 13V-248. The ODI complaints cited above can be reviewed at: http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID, see the attached list for ODI numbers.
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on February 9, 2012 in response to complaints alleging driver door module melting and/or burning in MY 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazers. In response to ODI's Information Request letter, General Motors presented 167 reports and 698 warranty claims that related to the alleged problem. ODI has received a total of 83 complaints, 66 alleging the door module had melted or burned, and the remaining 17 stating that the window switches acted erratically or were inoperative. Twenty-eight of the reports received have led to driver door fires, some of which allege the vehicle was keyed off and unattended. Based on the agency's current analysis, ODI has upgraded its investigation to an Engineering Analysis (EA12-004) to determine whether the subject vehicles contain a defect that presents an unreasonable risk to safety.The vehicle models and production dates of affected vehicles will be evaluated, particularly other GMT360 vehicles. The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed online at www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID under the following identification (ODI) numbers: 10247838, 10260600, 10274337, 10275626, 10284010, 10396958, 10406203, 10409023, 10414691, 10417938, 10423865, 10426281, 10434446, 10445657, 10447754, 10447757, 10447770, 10447788, 10447813, 10447831, 10447865, 10447880, 10447892, 10447938, 10447994, 10447996, 10447997, 10448028, 10448086, 10448138, 10448176, 10448201, 10448337, 10448455, 10448464, 10448478, 10448540, 10448900, 10448941, 10449150, 10449166, 10449169, 10449236, 10449722, 10450055, 10450202, 10450284, 10451584, 10451878, 10451918, 10452197, 10452301, 10452586, 10452743, 10452895, 10453161, 10453227, 10453261, 10453578, 10453746, 10453951, 10454196, 10454211, 10454539, 10454673, 10455122, 10455150, 10455279, 10455469, 10456285, 10456529, 10457116, 10457644, 10457811, 10458224, 10458485, 10458599, 10458743, 10458846, 10460062, 10460141, 10460732, 10460843
The office of defects investigations (ODI) analyzed complaint data provided by General Motors (GM) as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers.In total, there were 5,089 unique reports indicating an inaccurate fuel level reading while driving.General Motors stated that this condition occurs when the contacts of the fuel sensor wear prematurely.Most of the complaints indicated an empty fuel gauge reading after filling the tank.Less than 10 percent of theODI complaints involved an engine stall incident.During this investigation, GM developed a remedy procedure and issued special coverage bulletin instructing dealers to install a new design fuel level sensor.The bulletin was sent to dealers on August 10, 2011 and the owner letter mailing began on August 15, 2011.See the investigative file for copies of GM's bulletin and owner letter.This preliminary evaluation is closed.
The Office of Defects Investigation has received 668 complaints alleging inaccurate fuel gauge reading while driving in model year 2005-07 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Buick Rainier, and Saab 9-7x vehicles.Of the 668 complaints, 58 incidents were alleged to result in a vehicle stall.Of the 58 stalling incidents, 43 complaints reported stalling because the fuel level reading indicated more fuel availability than what is actually in the fuel tank. One complaint alleged a vehicle crash after the vehicle stalled while exiting the interstate, became disabled, and was struck from behind.Summarily, the complaints show an apparent increasing trend, with most complaints received within the past year.A Preliminary Evaluation has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and potential safety consequences associated with the alleged defect.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.