2000 Chevrolet Yukon
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Chevrolet › Yukon › 2000
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2000 Chevrolet Yukon. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
I too have a 2000 monte carlo that needs a manifold gasket do to the fact that the oil and coolant are leaking this car would always show low oil and we found that oil IS leaking into the coolant area this car IS the worse I have ever owned it has multi problems that consumers complain about(the big one being brakes locking up )every year I need new brakes and no I do not ride my brakes but no recalls are ever done. *Tr
I am the owner of a chevy tahoe model year 2000 vin# [xxx] , on 11/08/05 about 6:30 pm I was driving this vehicle on route 4 nj. My brakes failed and I hit the bumper of the car before me, I had my car towed in to my mechanic and upon inspection he showed me that both brake rotors which had the inner ring welded to the outer ring had the weld broken away , so that the inner ring was just spinning inside the outer rotor structure, he explained to me that I should buy a rotor which IS one piece therefore the inner print cant ever break away from the outer, my issue with gm IS why do they have total disregard for the safety of the people and would use a composite rotor putting people in jeopardy with total disregard of human life, when I paid about $ 34,000 for my SUV and they try to save 10-20 dollars, I have in my possession the separated rotors ( if needed for inspection) to sum it up it IS a dire danger to drive around with composite rotors, gm should be responsible for my loss and for the future losses of file and property due to this inferior material, please do something about this, before some people get killed. *jb updated 07/18/2012 *js information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(B)(6)
Vehicle made noise when braking. Vehicle was taken to the repair shop, and mechanic replaced the speed sensor, and both front and rear brake pads/rotors, and the hardware kits. Also, rear axle seal was replaced. a week later ABS brake light came back on while driving, and the ABS motor kept on running, even after switching off the vehicle. It was taken back to the repair shop, and mechanic replaced the electronic brake control module and the ABS motor. dealer and the manufacturer were not notified.* also, replaced front brake pads/calipers. *ak...also replaced rear axle seal. *ak
While braking brake light illuminated, and the brakes made a loud noise. dealership was notified, but did not resolve the problem. *Ak consumer said that anti-lock brakes failed. *la
When driving the vehicle suddenly accelerated. the driver put the vehicle in neutral before putting the vehicle in park. The consumer shut the vehicle off before restarting the vehicle. The owner has contacted dealership. *nm
On october 14, 2003, while sitting on the side of the road the vehicle was struck by a dump truck estimated speed was 30 mph. Upon impact no air bag was deployed. *Ak
Transmission IS slipping when the consumer IS driving. Contacted dealer. *Ak
Was driving 60mph & hit a bucket in road. bucket stayed under vehicle when changing lane to left. Was under right tire when it exploded. Had no brakes(abs) or steering. Lose control of vehicle. Started to slide & hit 2 other vehicles. Upon impact, air bags failed to deploy. brake pedal was not working. Finally vehicle had stopped. *ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
On January 11, 2011, ODI opened EA11-001 to investigate allegations of premature brake line corrosion failure in model year (MY) 1999 through 2003 General Motors (GM) full-size pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles sold or registered in the following region of the United States that NHTSA has viewed as salt states for investigations of corrosion related issues:Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.The subject vehicles represent the first five MY's of GM's GMT800 platform production, of which approximately 2,038,504 vehicles were sold in salt states (the subject vehicles).The GMT800 platform includes the following vehicles:1999-2007 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500, 2500 and 3500 series pick-up trucks; 2000-2006 Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon sport utility vehicles; and 2002-2006 Cadillac Escalade and Chevrolet Avalanche sport-utility vehicles.General Motors produced a total of approximately 10,427,062 GMT800 vehicles for sales in the United States, including almost 5 million that were sold in salt states.Although there are over 60 different brake pipe routing configuration used in GMT800 vehicles, with the exception of the rear crossover pipes in MY 200x-2007 vehicles that changed from rear disc to drum brakes, all of the vehicles use brake pipes from the same supplier with a common double-wall, brazed steel pipe design with a combination of hot dip Zinc-Aluminum corrosion protection coating and Aluminum paint outer layer known in the industry as AlGal (ASTM-B750). ODI analysis of field data regarding GMT800 vehicles identified a total of 3,645 complaints of brake pipe corrosion failures, including 107 alleging crashes, and 40 injuries.Though only 20% of total GMT800 production, due to age and region the subject vehicles account for a disproportionate share of the failure experience; with 2,702 of the complaints (75%), 88 of the crashes (82%) and 20 of the injuries (50%) reported in those vehicles.Analysis of the complaints showed strong correlations to vehicle age and region.For vehicles with less than 8 years of service, the complaint rates were minimal for all regions.In the salt states the failure rates begin to climb as the vehicles advance in age, particularly in the Northeast corner of the United States.The complaint rates in the salt states go from less than 0.1 incident per thousand vehicles (IPTV) at 7 years in service to over 1.0 IPTV after the 12th year of service for the subject pickup trucks and utility vehicles.Most of the failures reported to ODI occurred in vehicles with more than 10 years in service.ODI?s investigation did not identify any specific defect conditions that were causing or contributing to the brake pipe failures.Nor did the analysis isolate the problem to any subject vehicle sub-populations when analyzed by vehicle type or production range.The investigation found that vehicles experiencing brake pipe corrosion failures were likely to have general patterns of excessive corrosion on the majority of the brake pipe assembly and appear to be occurring due to expected wear out for the brake pipe coating material used in the subject vehicles and the environmental conditions in severe corrosion states.A safety-related defect has not been identified at this time.Accordingly, this investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor t
Odi's review of complaint data received since the close of ea04-011 revealed no indication that the investigation should be re-opened.more details can be found in the federal register notice enclosed in the dp05-009 public file.odi reserves the right to reopen the investigation in the future should conditions warrant.
Gm IS conducting a recall on all subject vehicles build between may 1999 and october 14, 1999.significant changes were incorporated into production in early october 1999, and vehicles built after that date have lower warranty failure rates.the complaint and warranty data appear to support the effectiveness of these changes. Gm made additional changes in november 1999, february 2000, may 2001, and february 2004.odi will continue to monitor this problem and will take further action, if warranted, in the future.for further technical details see the attached engineering analysis report.
There have been less than 2 complaints per 100,000 subject vehicles related to the alleged defect.the oldest vehicles (my 1999) have only 2 complaints in over 140 thousand vehicles after over 4 years in service.the rate of warranty claims potentially related to the alleged defect IS less than 0.1%.there are no known incidents involving rapid loss of tire pressure or loss of vehicle control. A defect trend has not been identified at this time.accordingly, this investigation IS closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.