1984 Dodge B250
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Dodge › B250 › 1984
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1984 Dodge B250. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
3 recalls name the 1984 Dodge B250. Newest first.
Occupants would not be adequately protected in event ofan accident or sudden stop.
Install proper mounting hardware and seat belts.
Piston within master cylinder may develop a seal leakage. This defect may result in intermittent loss of front wheel brakes.
Defective master cylinders will be replaced free of charge.
Altered vehicles either do not have rear couch seat belts installed, violating federal motor vehicle safety standard 208, occupant crash protection, or have rear couch seat belts which do not comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard 210, seat belt assembly anchorages.
Missing rear couch seat belts will be installed and improper anchors will be corrected without charge.
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Summary of information from manufacturer:chrysler recalled, in canada,67,602 1984 through 1987 passenger cars, trucks, and vans equipped with the5.2l engine for intermittent loss of brake power assist on a secondapplication of the brake pedal.the defect was a result of the brakebooster vacuum hose port in the base of the carburetor being blocked withfrozen moisture after an extended period of highway driving at low ambienttemperatures.to prevent this defect from occurring, the vacuum source forthe brake booster was relocated from the base of the carburetor to theintake manifold.it was stated that reports of the alleged defect haveoccurred in the northern areas of canada.analysis:review of manufacturer's data indicated at least 4 similar u.s.vehicles have experienced failures consistent with those reported in thecanadian market.one vehicle was a manufacturer test vehicle.the statesin which these reported failures occurred are alaska, minnesota (2), andwisconsin.it IS this engineer's opinion that there IS sufficient evidenceto suggest that the alleged defect could be reproduced by performing testsin a controlled environmental chamber.status:analyzing manufacturer's response at 12/09/87.===
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.