1992 Ford Probe
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Ford › Probe › 1992
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1992 Ford Probe. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
3 recalls name the 1992 Ford Probe. Newest first.
Note: driver's side (left) passive seat belt assembly. the rail of the automatic shoulder belt can wear sufficiently such that the cable which retracts the buckle assembly will become jammed in the rail rendering the shoulder belt inoperative.
In the event of a vehicle crash, the occupant would not be adequately restrained increasing the risk of personal injury.
Dealers will replace driver side and inoperative passenger side shoulder belt track assemblies.
Note: passenger side (right) seat belt assembly. the rail of the automatic shoulder belt can wear sufficiently such that the cable which retracts the buckle assembly will become jammed in the rail rendering the shoulder belt inoperative.
In the event of a vehicle crash, the occupant would not be adequately restrained increasing the risk of personal injury.
Dealers will replace driver side and inoperative passenger side shoulder belt track assemblies.
The groove for the rear wheel bearing retainer ring was incorrectly machined.
If the retaining ring does not sit correctly in thegroove, the axle lug nuts will break, causing the brake drum, wheel, and tireassembly to separate from the vehicle.
Midas shops will replace the brake drums with other brake drums from another supplier.
Tl*the contact owns a 1992 ford probe. While the vehicle was parked she attempted to use the driver's seat belt and the seat belt would not move out of the retractor. The vehicle was taken to the dealer and the dealer advised her that they no longer have any books on how to repair the seat belt. She reference recall nhtsa campaign ID number: 96v172001, seat belts:front:webbing and stated the recall work was performed. she called the manufacturer and they have sent her several letters. The approximate failure mileage was 108,000 and the current mileage was 110,000. updated 11/08/10 * bf the consumer stated she has been without the shoulder belt for about 1 year. Updated 11/10/10
Tl*the contact owns a 1992 ford probe. The contact stated that when she attempted to buckle the seat belt, it would not retract to secure the driver. The contact disengaged the belt. The contact called the authorized dealer and was informed that the vehicle was too old for them to look up the remedy in the diagnostic manual. There was a recall related to the failure (96v172001 seat belts:front:webbing). The failure mileage was approximately 106,000. The current mileage was approximately 110,000. Updated 07/06/10. *Lj the consumer stated the seat belt stopped working. Updated 09/21/10
TL* the contact owns a 1992 ford probe. The contact stated that the repair for recall 96v172001 (seat belts:front:webbing) was performed in 2007 but the failure recurred the complaint does not explain what was repaired. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealership where the contact was informed that the repair could not be performed again free of charge due to the age of the vehicle. The failure mileage was approximately 106,000. The current mileage was approximately 108,000. Updated 7/06/10. *Lj updated 07/09/10.*jb
Six months after purchasing a 92 probe V6 with 59,000 miles on it I had transmission trouble. The transmission began slipping one week when I was traveling to school and when I came home that weekend it wouldn't shift into any gear. after letting it sit I was able to bring it home, although it shifted rough from neutral to 1ST and to second, then wouldn't shift into third at all. I had to use manual shift mode to keep it from shifting into third. while changing transmission fluid it we noticed a burnt oil smell to it. changing the fluid had little effect. the worst thing IS that I was also looking at a 91 grand am 4 cyl for $200 less. *tr
Drivers side (left) passive seat belt assembly. The rail of the automatic shoulder belt has worn sufficiently such that the cable which retracts the buckle assembly has become jammed in the rail rendering the shoulder belt inoperative. According the letter written by mr. Jonathan d. White recall analysis division office of defect investigation safety assurance. "Ford IS responsible for the remedy of these vehicles from the date of aug 22, 1996 forward,regardless of vehicle age mileage or ownership." not giving an ending date. There recall involves 224,000 ford motor company vehicles 1990 through 1992 ford probe model equipped with front seat motorized (passive) shoulder belts as standard equipment and manufactured from aug 14, 1989 through feb 7, 1992. My vehicle was made nov 1, 1991 within the limits of the recall. recall no.96s48. I purchased the vehicle used. I called ford motor company at 800-392-3673. I was told that there were no recalls on my vehicle and the recalls are different in different states. *Jb
Seat belt broke. in 1996 there was a recall on the drivers side seat belt track, at that time the consumer seat belt was already broke, but was not included in the recall. the consumer wrote a letter to ford about the seat belt and eventually it was fixed under the recall. the passenger side seat belt was checked and the mechanic stated it was fine. in 2000 the drivers side seat belt broke again, but this time the consumer had to pay for the repairs. Now the passenger seat belt IS broke, the consumer called ford to inquire about a recall for the passenger seat belt but was told there was no recall. *jb
Automatic driver's seat belt IS inoperative. the shoulder strap IS jammed in the rail behind the shoulder of the driver. recall 96v172001 was issued on make,/model and year, but this vehicle was not included in the recall due to vin.*ak *la
The consumer heard a noise from the vehicle, and he soon discovered the right rear tire had experienced tread separation. *jb
The seat belt was extremely tight.*jb
Both drivers side and passenger side shoulder belts lock up continuously. there was a recall on february 2, 1997 on both of them. the previous owner has had them replaced. both sides still lock up all the time preventing movement of any kind.*ak
Driver's side headlamp switch failed. *Yh
The transmission failed while driving. nlm
Automatic retractor does not retract, vehicle has been repaired under recall 96 v 172 000. dealer was notified. Please provide additional information.*ak
Nhtsa recall ID# 96-v-172-002/ manufacturer's recall 96s99, automatic seat belt retractor on passenger's side IS stuck in one position. automatic seat belt IS suppose to retract back and forward across consumer when door IS opened and closed. passenger's side seat belt IS being replaced for second time. Dealer was notified, an drecall repairs were performed once. please provide the vehicle ID number and mileage.*ak
Passenger's and driver's automatic seat belts are frozen. cables are jammed. There IS a recall 96v172000/ manufacturer's recall 96s48. recall IS no longer in effect, and there was nothing they could do. *ak at time of recall, consumer had taken vehicle to dealer who stated there were no problems, therefore no corrections needed to be made. *slc
Passenger's automatic set belt came out of t track after hitting a deer. seat belt was in use at time. Passenger was thrown forward when belt broke. Had no airbags. No injuries. *ak
Regarding ford recall # 96s48 and 96s99 - seat belt recall. dealership claims that they performed replacement of seatbelt track and motor assembly on february 25, 1997. however, the repair has failed just as the recall described the original problem. ford will not agree to fix this safety issue claiming that the work has already been done. I contend that I received either faulty parts and / or shoddy workmanship from the dealership. can you help me resolve this issue with ford? thank you. Mi. *Ak
While driving in traffic the vehicle stopped while making a left turn, the ignition was rewired, consumer believes these ignition problems are identical to the problems in california with the tfi module and request reimbursement. nlm
Vehicle shutdown at highway speeds due to ignition, and started to run hot, causing damage to the motor. *Ak
Windshield wipers park in vertical position on windshield obscuring vision. Dealer replaced wiper motor assembly, wiper switch and harness. Total $820.87 for repairs. Seems to be a common problem-many probes being driven with wipers parked on windshield. Ford issued service bulletins #9546 and#9582. Can I get reimbursed from ford for this safety related repair? *Ak
Motor belt needs replaced, the unit was replaced under recall two years prior and was working at the time of replacement, failure not covered under warranty. *mjs
Request information about 96s48 recall from ford and warrantywork from it. No safety defect (s) listed in summary. *ak
Hitch that was attached to vehicle (dixie trailer hitch) IS not sufficient to carry 2,000 lbs as stated, attached to thin sheet metal. mjs
The oil pan seal was replaced by adams ford in belton missouri twice under warranty and once after the part replaced was out of warranty !!! Now the problem IS back again after just a little over a year and a half of driving!! Adams ford will not admit that there IS a problem and I believe that 4 times in 7 years IS a little much. *Ak
No summary listed for above vehicle. *ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
On june 29, 2007, nhtsa received a petition from mr. Richard h. Mcswain of mcswain engineering inc., requesting that the agency investigate seatback recliner failure in the subject vehicles. The petitioner identified a failure mode involving bypass of the seatback stop pin which could result in a false or partial engagement of the sector and pawl teeth, allowing the seatback to recline in a vehicular collision.odi believes that the alleged failure mode may be the result of progressive wear and tear of the seatback stop pin, the seatback stop, and other seat components in vehicles that are, on average, 17 years old.available data do not suggest that this has occurred with a notable frequency. Odi reviewed its consumer complaint data received over the last nineteen years and found no complaints of seatback collapse (with or without a vehicle collision) in the subject vehicles.considering the advanced age of the subject vehicles, it IS unlikely that nhtsa would issue an order for the notification and remedy of the alleged defect as defined by the petitioner at the conclusion of the investigation requested in the petition.the statutory requirement that the manufacturer provide a free remedy does not apply if the vehicle was bought by the first purchaser more than 10 calendar years before an order IS issued. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize nhtsa's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition IS denied.
There is no summary currently available
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.