2001 GMC C3
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2001 GMC C3. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
ABS and brake lights come on at the same time! I am concerned that my brakes will fail! Sounds like this IS a on going and expensive problem. Ebcm IS at fault. *tr
Auto dimming mirror ( on a 2001 GMC sierra C-3 pickup IS malfunctioning) took to dealership on aug 21 to have mirror and a/c worked on. auto dimming feature IS malfunctioning and at night causes you to see 3 images when there IS only one actual. for city driving especially, this causes a safety problem, can't tell what lane other vehicles are in behind you. during the daylight hours, a purple haze outline IS around all mirror images and depending on angle looked at, sometimes duplicate images. daylight hours are not really a safety problem, but night time driving IS a major safety issue in my opinion. dealer said they could not work on and stated doc. # 1841960 from gm stating that this IS normal on auto dimming mirrors and that no repairs were to be made on said condition. my driver side mirror IS only one with malfunction. called the customer assistance #'s with gm and even offered to purchase new mirror at my cost. ca said they would check with their field rep's and call me back in 48 hours. as of now, 9 days, later, have called twice more and still have no callback or further information. *nm
I was recently told by the previous owner of my truck that he thought there was a recall in regards to the brakes. Since I had not received a notice of recall, I went to your website and looked it up. I noticed that there was a recall in regards to the rear parking brake. Nhtsa campaign ID 05v161000. In january of this year I took my GMC sierra C3 to the dealership due to a pulsing when I went to stop. I thought that the rotors may need to be reground or replaced. I was instructed however that it was caused by the rear parking brake assembly seizing up. I called GMC and inquired about this, (GMC customer service trackiing #1-337051820) because the problem from your website IS identical to work that was performed on my vehicle. GMC indicated that my vin number was not affected, and would not discuss the matter further. The work that was performed on my vehicle IS as follows: concer: ck brakes pulsate correction: replace rear brake pads rotors and park brake shoes ness to replace lr park brsake mounting plate r and r trans if any further information or documentation IS needed please feel free to call
The driver's airbag in my 2001 GMC sierra C3 did not deploy in my accident. The impact was head on and primarily damaged the vehicle on the driver's side. The vehicle was traveling approximately 50 mph and I strongly feel that my injuries sustained from the accident could have been far less severe if the airbag had deployed as designed. *la
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
In a letter dated november 7, 2007, general motors (gm) reported to the office of defects investigation (odi) that it will conduct a safety recall (07v-521) to replace the crank position sensor (ckp) in approximately 12,000 model year (my) 2001 chevrolet silverado and GMC sierra vehicles equipped with 8.1 liter engines manufactured on or before november 15, 2000.according to gm, the ckp can fail intermittently or permanently.a permanent ckp failure would result in an engine stall without restart.an intermittent ckp failure could cause the service engine soon light to illuminate, the vehicle to run rough or the engine to stall but allows restart.as a remedy, an improved ckp will be installed in the subject vehicles.the recall campaign will start in december 2007. During the preliminary evaluation (pe06-016), and this ea investigation, gm and odi independently conducted detailed reviews of certain field data to understand the nature and rate of subject vehicle stalling due to ckp failures.gm and odi reviewed gm's warranty claims for the ckp with the objective of ascertaining an estimate of those claims representing an engine stall while driving.the ckp warranty claims without verbatim text were the largest segment of warranty claims.using those claims, gm surveyed vehicle owners to gather additional information to determine if the claim was associated with a stall while driving event.based on the survey, gm estimated that approximately 49% of all warranty repairs for the ckp involved a stall while driving.odi?s review of gm's survey data produced a higher estimate (71%) for stall while driving.gm further estimated the rate of stall while driving for the subject vehicles over time.it estimated stalling while driving rates of 1.6%, 4.6% and 8.9% at 1, 3 and 6 years in service respectively.odi's review of the gm's survey data finds higher estimated stall while driving rates of 2.2%, 6.8% and 13% at 1, 3 and 6 years in service respectively. Odi also conducted a survey of vehicle owners using consumer complaints reported to both odi and gm.the objective was to ascertain the potential safety consequences of an engine stall due to the alleged defect.with respect to the ability to restart the vehicle after a stall, 11% reported immediate restart, 69% reported delayed restart and 20% reported no restart.over half noted at least one engine stall incident at speeds in excess of 40mph. About one-third noted the vehicle was stranded either partially or fully in a lane of traffic after the engine stall.all of the consumers surveyed noted multiple stalling events prior to proper diagnosis and replacement of the ckp.based on gm's decision to conduct a safety recall, this investigation IS closed.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.