1987 Pontiac Sunbird
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Pontiac › Sunbird › 1987
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1987 Pontiac Sunbird. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
2 recalls name the 1987 Pontiac Sunbird. Newest first.
Certain replacement fuel filters, fram brand name p/n g3727, with date codes x52911 through x60801 sequentially or x600141 and a mexico country or origin marking on the fuel filter housing manufactured from october 18, 2005, through march 21, 2006, sold for use on the vehicles listed above and on certain school buses. (to see the school bus engine sizes…
This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Honeywell will notify owners and replace the fuel filters free of charge. the recall began on october 18, 2006. owners may contact fram customer service at 1-800-890-2075 (option 1).
The fuel feed and/or return hose/pipe assemblies could crack or separate, allowing fuel to leak into the underhood area.
This could result in an underhood fire, without priorwarning, and cause injury to occupants.
Replace both fuel feed and return hose/pipe assemblies.
None
Tire replaced.
Engine locked up, causing fire.
Engine fire.
Wrong alternator installed in vehicle at factory, causing alternator to overheat. *Dsh
Have the air conditioner repair about three times and still doesn't work . tt
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
There is no summary currently available
===
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
Summary of information from manufacturer: general motors has submited one field report pertaining to a customer owned vehicle with problem.analysis: inspection by odi engineer revealed a missing nut and cotter pin which holdsthe tie rod end to the steering knuckle. The hex nut apparently had never been installed. Owner had driven vehicle one day (less than 50 miles) since taking delivery. G.m.'s one field report stated that the tie rod came apart during test drive and the tie rod nut was also missing. It would appear these are two isolated incidents.proposed action: close thispreliminary evaluation.===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.