1987 Toyota MR2
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Toyota › MR2 › 1987
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1987 Toyota MR2. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
In 1987 I had a toyota MR2 and was in an accident in which the gas pedal stuck. Fortunately, it was a single vehicle crash on a california interstate. *Tr
I have 12 pages of suppoting documents. the short version IS that I purchased an engine from the above-mentioned company that was defective. I filed a claim on 11/16/01, only eight days after the engine was installed. they sent me a new part after many weeks and many days of accrued rental car expenses, for which they promised to pay. after the part was installed, they only agreed to pay for a small percentage of what they had promised, and, then, within less than 2,000 miles and two months, the part failed again. at this point, my mechanic advised me of 10 engines purchased from this company that had to be returned because they, too, were defective, and he suggested that I return my engine for a complete refund of parts and labor in the amount of $2,998.60.*ak
While driving hood latch released, causing hood to fly up, blocking drivers vision, and cracking the windshield. *ak the crumpled hood damaged the sus roof as well. *yh
Seat belt on the passenger side does not release from locking mechanism. *Ak
Bought car with 97,800 miles carfax reports much higher miles than that. Odometer was tampered with.*ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Summary of information from manufacturer:after investigation, toyota canfind no common or specific cause of the 4 fires from a vehicle populationof 77,034.warranty claims are inconclusive and parallel vehicle sales.analysis:a review of the 2 complaints on the 1986 model MR2 sport coupe(a relatively low production, special interest vehicle) did not reveal apotentially common cause.both vehicles were occupied at the time of thefires.one fire was noticed because the electrical accessories failedand the engine would not restart, moments later smoke and flames engulfedthe engine compartment.the owner of the other vehicle reports thevehicle was stopped at idle when he noticed flames out of the right ofthe engine compartment.status:recommend closing this pe and monitor for future evidence of anemerging defect trend.#===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.