2004 Infiniti FX45
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Infiniti › FX45 › 2004
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2004 Infiniti FX45. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
7 recalls name the 2004 Infiniti FX45. Newest first.
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2001-2003 Maxima, 2002-2006 Sentra, 2002-2004 Pathfinder, 2007-2011 Versa Sedan and Versa Hatchback, 2001-2004 Infiniti I30 and I35, 2002-2003 Inifiniti QX4, 2003-2008 Infiniti FX35 and FX45 and 2006-2010 M35 and M45 vehicles. The vehicles are equipped with non-desiccated, frontal passenger air bag…
An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the front passenger air bag inflators with alternate desiccated inflators, free of charge. The recall began February 12, 2020. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 888-737-9511 or Infiniti customer service at 888-810-3715.
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2003-2008 Infiniti FX35 and FX45, 2003-2004 Infiniti I35, 2006-2010 Infiniti M35 and M45, and 2007-2011 Nissan Versa vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa…
An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began December 21, 2017. All owners should receive a second notice by May 15, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2001-2003 Nissan Maxima, 2002-2004 Pathfinder, 2002-2006 Sentra, 2002-2003 Infiniti QX4 and I35, 2003 FX35 and FX45, and 2001 I30 vehicles. Upon deployment of the passenger side frontal air bag, excessive internal pressure may cause the inflator to rupture.
In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants potentially resulting in serious injury or death.
Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began on June 15, 2015. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261. Note: On December 18, 2015 Nissan informed NHTSA of an amendment of this recall to remove 2004-2005 Infiniti FX35 and FX45 vehicles.
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2003-2004 Infiniti I35, 2003-2005 FX35 and FX45, and 2006 M35 and M45 vehicles originally sold, or currently registered, in geographic locations associated with high absolute humidity. Specifically, vehicles sold, or ever registered, in Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin…
In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passengers frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants potentially resulting in serious injury or death.
Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began on June 16, 2015. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261. Note: This recall supersedes recall 14V-701.
During a canadian compliance test, certain sport utility vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, 'lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.' the headlamp assemblies do not meet the headlamp photometric values requirements of the standard.
This standard IS to reduce traffic accidents and deaths and injuries resulting from traffic accidents, by providing adequate illumination of the roadway, and by enhancing the conspicuity of motor vehicles on the public roads so that their presence IS perceived and their signals understood, both in daylight and in darkness or other conditions of reduced visibility.
Dealers will replace the headlamp assemblies. The recall began on december 18, 2006. owners may contact infiniti at 1-800-662-6200.
During a canadian compliance test, certain sport utility vehicles failed to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, 'lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.' a rear combination lamp assembly did not meet the requirements.
This standard IS to reduce traffic accidents and deaths and injuries resulting from traffic accidents, by providing adequate illumination of the roadway, and by enhancing the conspicuity of motor vehicles on the public roads so that their presence IS perceived and their signals understood, both in daylight and in darkness or other conditions of reduced visibility.
Dealers will replace the rear combination lamp assemblies. the recall began on december 18, 2006. owners may contact infiniti at at 1-800-662-6200.
On certain passenger and sport utility vehicles, the fuel filler hose may crack and result in fuel leakage from the hose while refueling.
Fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire.
Dealers will replace the fuel filler hose. recall began on february 27, 2006, for nissan owners, and on march 13, 2006, for infiniti owners. owners may contact nissan at 1-800-647-7261 or infiniti at 1-800-662-6200.
The fuel gauge doesn’t accurately show the correct amount of fuel that’s in the suv. This is a safety issue when driving and not knowing how much fuel you have.
3 of my vehicles doors do not unlock or lock using the key fob or the unlock/lock button on the door. This can be dangerous if you need to lock or unlock the doors in a hurry. It IS a known issue in many infiniti fx35/45 of this generation. *tr
TL* takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact received a recall notification for nhtsa campaign number: 16v349000 (air bags) in july of 2016. The vehicle was taken to infiniti of apex (1900 laura duncan rd, apex, nc 27523) and the recall repair was performed in march of 2019; however, the air bag warning indicator was illuminated. The contact informed the dealer by phone and they wanted to charge for a diagnostic test. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 118,000.
Right side back passenger seat belt does work. Cannot use.
TL* the contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact stated that the dashboard was beginning to form bubbles the size of door knobs. The failure produced a glare from the bubbles, which made it difficult to see out of the front windshield. The dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed the contact that there was no recall on the failure; however, the warranty was extended an additional four years around 2006. The contact was also informed that due to the vehicle not being brought in around the time of the warranty extension, they were no longer obligated to provide the repair free of charge. The vehicle had not been repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 110,000.
TL* takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact stated that the recall notice for nhtsa campaign number: 16v349000 (air bags) was received in june of 2016. After contacting the dealer and the manufacturer on multiple occasions, the contact was informed that the parts needed for the recall remedy were still not available and no estimated time for receiving the parts could be provided. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
TL* takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 16v349000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. The vin was not available. Parts distribution disconnect.
TL* the contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 16v349000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.
TL* takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 infiniti FX45. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 16v349000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.
I bought the vehicle from orange auto sales very poor customer service from the day I brought the car its been a problem they were saying they were going to fix it to my satisfaction as a customer so I purchase the car not only that they have tax fraud going on I ask orange auto sales to fix the reason why engine light on the dvd player turning signals and navigation system as of today the only items that have been fixed where the turning signals a the navigation system half way completed they never properly installed the navigation system screws where missing just wasnt bolted down like it were supposed to be I payed the man $7300 one payment of $7000 cash and also another payment of $300 cash which was supposed to be made when car was completely ready for customer or the satisfaction we agreed upon I mentioned fraud because orange auto sales documented that I only gave the $4100 for first payment and $300 for second payment I have copies of the information showing the account of fraud not only fraud but false advertising about the car saying like saying he already had fixed some but never have all I ask was for good customer service the owner which IS name alex push/shove me will arguing not once did I attempt to use physical force every time I call to see whats going on with the vehicle no answer they responded to me with a text then one of his workers locked me inside the gate as if I committed a crime holding me against will while trying to lock gate knowing my car IS park by the gate the man stratches my car I have him on camera not only that they have the 2004 infinite towed from there shop leaving me with towing costs of $247.80 the owner said he would only refund $4300 of $7300 orange auto sales IS the worst dealership with a certified license to sale vehicle's in houston, tx very unprofessional acts.
I bought the vehicle from orange auto sales very poor customer service from the day I brought the car its been a problem they were saying they were going to fix it to my satisfaction as a customer so I purchase the car not only that they have tax fraud going on I ask orange auto sales to fix the reason why engine light on the dvd player turning signals and navigation system as of today the only items that have been fixed where the turning signals a the navigation system half way completed they never properly installed the navigation system screws where missing just wasnt bolted down like it were supposed to be I payed the man $7300 one payment of $7000 cash and also another payment of $300 cash which was supposed to be made when car was completely ready for customer or the satisfaction we agreed upon I mentioned fraud because orange auto sales documented that I only gave the $4100 for first payment and $300 for second payment I have copies of the information showing the account of fraud not only fraud but false advertising about the car saying like saying he already had fixed some but never have all I ask was for good customer service the owner which IS name alex push/shove me will arguing not once did I attempt to use physical force every time I call to see whats going on with the vehicle no answer they responded to me with a text then one of his workers locked me inside the gate as if I committed a crime holding me against will while trying to lock gate knowing my car IS park by the gate the man stratches my car I have him on camera not only that they have the 2004 infinite towed from there shop leaving me with towing costs of $247.80 the owner said he would only refund $4300 of $7300 orange auto sales IS the worst dealership with a certified license to sale vehicle's in houston, tx very unprofessional acts.
Driver side seat track loose and moves when braking or accelerating. Very unstable and has a hard click. Back door cannot be locked via the buttons and must be locked then unlocked manually. *jb
The door lock on the passenger front door no longer works via the power door lock switch or key fob. it must locked/unlocked manually. the mechanic reported that the lock actuator needed to be replaced. *tr
The drivers side seat will no longer move back/forward. the right side of the seat remains stationary and the left side moves making the seat swivel. the mechanic checked it out and determined that the gear was stripped. *tr
The lock actuator on the rear hatch broke and I was unable to close the hatch or lock the vehicle. after dissembling the actuator there was a small plastic pin that broke that prevented the latch from engaging. I then had to pay over $400.00 to have it replaced for a plastic piece that probably cost less than $1 to manufacture. *tr
Front passenger door lock and rear driver's side door lock do not close and / or open when either door lock switch in car IS pressed or door lock on remote IS pressed. am told it can be an actuator. called the dealer to get repaired and told it IS not a recall and want to charge hundreds of dollars, yet just from using search engine online there are hundreds of other customers experiencing the same issues on nissan maximas, altimas, muranos, infinity FX45, FX35, amongst many other "nissan" vehicles. *Tr
2004 infiniti FX45 - door power lock (actuator) not working correctly. this failure IS an intermittent of operation. Sometimes the doors lock ok, other times they don't. in addition, sometimes the doors unlock ok, other times they don't. it IS possibly a safety issue. The door lock IS most "lazy" and the problem worsens in hot weather. quick search online reveals that this IS vastly common problem in infiniti/nissan cars. 1. Having a secure environment IS paramount in certain neighborhoods. When locking the doors it's imperative nobody can gain access at will by walking up to the car. If anyone can simply open the door to gain access, carjacking, injury, or even murder IS easier. If the doors locked properly this provides a more secure environment for this type of scenario. 2. Nissan knowing there IS a security problem with their locking mechanism and not recalling them for safety concern IS negligent. In this case there's no obvious indication the door isn't locked unless someone walks up and opens it from the outside. The driver "thinks" the door IS locked, when in reality it's an "open door" for carjacking or robbery. this failure IS an intermittent of operation. Sometimes the doors lock ok, other times they don't. In addition, sometimes the doors unlock ok, other times they don't. 3. In emergencies it's important to be able to unlock doors quickly. Since 99% of the time we all use the button to lock and unlock doors, using the manual locking lever IS unfamiliar. in emergencies every second counts. The locking/unlocking solenoid malfunctioning IS clearly a high risk in emergency scenarios. Some people who cannot afford the $1600 to have all the locks replaced (as quoted by dealers) will forgo getting them fixed, putting their family members at risk with the above mishap examples. This shouldn't be, nissan should recall them. *Tr
Normal use of power door locks later the function becomes unreliable. Cannot effectively lock or unlock doors. Had one door lock repaired and immediately after that another lock has malfunctioned. *Tr
Multiple brake issues, causing a safety issue. *nm
The brightness/intensity of the led brake lights (and turn signals) on new infinity L45 vehicles IS extremely high and IS nearly blinding when following behind in another vehicle. they must be out of specification range.*ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE14-016 in June 2014 based on six inflator rupture incidents involving consumer owned vehicles produced by five vehicle manufacturers.All six vehicles were operated in Florida or Puerto Rico at the time of the rupture and for the majority of their service life, and were equipped with inflators produced by Takata, a tier-one supplier of automotive air bag systems.During the course of PE14-016, ODI determined that five additional vehicle manufacturers used inflators of a similar design and vintage also supplied by Takata. No evidence of field failures was found in vehicles produced by these five additional manufacturers.Nonetheless, at ODI's insistence, all 10 vehicle manufacturers initiated a regional recall within approximately two weeks of the opening of the investigation.The regions recalled initially included Florida, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, areas with high absolute humidity and climatic conditions believed to be a significant factor in the inflator ruptures.As part of the recall actions, inflators removed from remedied vehicles are to be returned to Takata for testing.Takata's initial test results on passenger inflators from remedied vehicles indicated a much higher than anticipated rupture frequency for inflators returned from Florida.Accordingly ODI requested all 10 manufacturers expand the regional recalls for passenger inflators to include other geographic areas where high absolute humidity conditions exist, including the Gulf States and other coastal areas.Takata's testing of the passenger inflators to date continues to indicate this geographic area as having the highest risk, with no ruptures occurring from inflators returned from outside the expanded recall regions.During PE14-016 four additional passenger inflator field events occurred, all in vehicles from the same expanded geographic region.Also during PE14-016 four additional driver inflator field events occurred including two in vehicles from regions not known for high absolute humidity, specifically California and North Carolina.Accordingly, ODI requested all five of the affected vehicle manufacturers currently using the subject Takata driver inflators expand to nationwide recalls.Significantly, neither of the affected vehicle manufacturers or Takata provided any explanation to account for these two driver air bag inflator ruptures outside the area of high absolute humidity.Takata testing of returned driver inflators indicates a lower rupture frequency as compared to passenger inflator testing.All test ruptures reported by Takata to date have occurred on inflators returned from high absolute humidity areas.The investigation now includes all manufacturers and vehicles known to be affected at this time.ODI's investigation will focus on, among other things, root cause analysis, other potential defect consequences, identification of affected vehicles scope, and adequacy of the remedy.The five ODI reports cited above can be reviewed online at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID under the following identification numbers: 10537899, 10568848, 10585224, 10605877, 10651492
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE14-016 in June 2014 based on six inflator rupture incidents involving consumer owned vehicles produced by five vehicle manufacturers.All six vehicles were operated in Florida or Puerto Rico at the time of the rupture and for the majority of their service life, and were equipped with inflators produced by Takata, a tier-one supplier of automotive air bag systems.During the course of PE14-016, ODI determined that five additional vehicle manufacturers used inflators of a similar design and vintage also supplied by Takata. No evidence of field failures was found in vehicles produced by these five additional manufacturers.Nonetheless, at ODI's insistence, all 10 vehicle manufacturers initiated a regional recall within approximately two weeks of the opening of the investigation.The regions recalled initially included Florida, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, areas with consistently high absolute humidity and climatic conditions believed to be a significant factor in the inflator ruptures.As part of the recall actions, inflators removed from remedied vehicles are to be returned to Takata for testing.Takata's initial test results on passenger inflators from remedied vehicles indicated a much higher than anticipated rupture frequency for inflators returned from Florida.Accordingly, ODI requested all 10 manufacturers expand the regional recalls for passenger inflators to include other geographic areas where high absolute humidity conditions exist, including the Gulf States and other coastal areas.Takata's testing of the passenger inflators to date continues to indicate this geographic area as having the highest risk, with no ruptures occurring from inflators returned from outside the expanded recall regions.During PE14-016, four additional passenger inflator field events occurred, all in vehicles from the same expanded geographic region.Also during PE14-016, four additional driver inflator field events occurred including two in vehicles from regions not known for high absolute humidity, specifically California and North Carolina.Accordingly, ODI requested all five of the affected vehicle manufacturers currently using the subject Takata driver inflators expand to nationwide recalls.Significantly, neither of the affected vehicle manufacturers or Takata provided any explanation to account for these two driver air bag inflator ruptures outside the area of high absolute humidity.Takata testing of returned driver inflators indicates a lower rupture frequency as compared to passenger inflator testing.All test ruptures reported by Takata to date have occurred on inflators returned from high absolute humidity areas.The PE is now closed/upgraded to an Engineering Evaluation (EA15-001) to include all manufacturersand vehicles known to be affected at this time.ODI's EA investigation will focus on, among other things, root cause analysis, other potential defect consequences, identification of affected vehicles scope, and adequacy of the remedy.The recalls related to this PE are: 14V343, 14V344, 14V348, 14V351, 14V353, 14V655, 14V700, 14V701, 14V752, 14V763, 14V770, 14V773, 14V787, 14V802 and 14V817.The number of vehicles affected are an estimate since some vehicles may have both the driver and passenger side inflators recalled. The five ODI reports cited above can be reviewed online at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID under the following identification numbers: 10537899, 10568848, 10585224, 10605877, 10651492
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.