1992 Jaguar XJ6
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Jaguar › XJ6 › 1992
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1992 Jaguar XJ6. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
2 recalls name the 1992 Jaguar XJ6. Newest first.
Certain replacement fuel filters, fram brand name p/n g3727, with date codes x52911 through x60801 sequentially or x600141 and a mexico country or origin marking on the fuel filter housing manufactured from october 18, 2005, through march 21, 2006, sold for use on the vehicles listed above and on certain school buses. (to see the school bus engine sizes…
This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Honeywell will notify owners and replace the fuel filters free of charge. the recall began on october 18, 2006. owners may contact fram customer service at 1-800-890-2075 (option 1).
The normal lockup function of the automatic (passive) belt reel can cause the belt motor winch assembly to lockup such that the passive belt system will not deploy/function or gets stuck at various points along the track causing the kinking or breaking of its cable or detachment of the tongue.
If this occurs the occupants of the vehicle cannot usethe safety belts, increasing the risk of injury in the event of a sudden stopor accident.
Jaguar will repair the passive belt system if this problem occurs or has occurred. Jaguar will notify owners of the existence of a lifetime warranty on components of the automatic (passive) belt system.
TL* the contact owns a 1992 jaguar XJ6. The contact stated that the front driver and passenger seat belts would not retract or tighten while in use. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the contact was informed that the tracking needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The current and the failure mileages were 100,000.
TL* the contact owns a 1992 jaguar XJ6. The driver and passenger front automatic shoulder belt retractors were inoperative. consequently the seat belt can not be extracted from the retractor. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for inspection. the technician stated the seat belt retractor system required replacement. no repairs were made. The failure mileage was 130,000. the current mileage was 135,000. updated 03/04/10 *bf the consumer was informed the seat belt retractors were no longer available. Also, stated the fuel feed hose was defective which caused gas to leak onto the engine block. updated 05/20/10.*jb
As warranty item, dealer repaired broken passenger side motorized seat belt assembly. However, dealer refused to repair under warranty the broken seat belt buckle that attached to motorized assembly. Requested $330 for repair/replacement. Believe this IS attempt by mfg to circumvent spirit of not the letter of restraint system regs, as seat belt system IS only as reliable as weakest component, in this case a non-functioning buckle. like the motorized belts, the buckle should be a lifetime warranty item if the regs are to have meaning. *Ak *jb ******dims 11 ivoq entry posted after 12/12/02 cut-over to artemis*****770288.
No summary. dt
Fuel pump connectors inside fuel tank malfunctioned, causing vehicle to shutdown when ever consumer was driving. Contacted dealer, and dealer was not willing to do anything.*ak
Passive restraint mortor belt malfunctioned.
Took my vehicle to the local dealer to repair the passenger-side passive motorized seat belt assembly. Dealer repaired under warranty, but refused to replace the defective seat belt buckle that connects to the assembly. Requested $330 for repair. Since system IS not fully operative with defective buckle, believe this IS an attempt to circumvent the vehicle safety regulations. It violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the safety regulations. Am concerned that inoperative buckle could be a serious safety hazard in event of crash, as it would make exit from vehicle difficult. Mfg. Should replace faulty buckle as part of lifetime warranty on restraint system.
Head previously (8/13/01) reported to you the refusal of the dealer/mfg. To replace an inoperative seat belt buckle that IS part of the passive motorized seat belt assembly . Requested $330 to repair/replace. By coincidence, the buckle on the driver's side assembly failed in exactly the same way only hours after initial report filed. while both buckles can be connected, they cannot easilyt be removed, and represent a dangerous safety hazard in the event of a crash. Exiting the vehicle would be more difficult. Believe that repair/replacement of buckles could be covered as part of lifetime warranty of vehicle restraint system. Refusal to cover as warranty item IS against spirit and intent of vehicle safety regulations.
Passenger's side seatbelt will intermittently stay in locking position and finally it will release. *ak
Rear suspension IS gone. vehicle bounces around significantly. dealer recommends replacement with rear end kit. *ak
Driver and passenger seatbelts little red buckle which states "press" broke, which the occupant may buckle the seatbelt in, but not able to release appropiately. *ak
Driver side seatback jammed into the reclining position. dealer has been contacted. *ak
The wheel lugs: nuts that secure the bolts to the rear wheel are beginning to disconnect. *ak
Sudden rapid acceleration, resulting in loss of control/accident. *ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
There is no summary currently available
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.