1986 Mercury Cougar
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Mercury › Cougar › 1986
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1986 Mercury Cougar. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
2 recalls name the 1986 Mercury Cougar. Newest first.
Spring lock fuel line coupling may not be properly engaged.
Coupling could disengage due to fuel pressure,vibration, and engine movements; this would cause loss of fuel which, inpresence of an ignition source, creates a fire risk.
Install retainer clips over the couplings to prevent coupling separation and fuel leakage.
Headlamp covers were installed on vehicles in error. causing the cars not to comply with fmvss 108, lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment. consequence of defect: the headlamp covers may hinder the…
Head gasket on 3.8 engine has blown two times in 8 months. Car overheats and has oil in radiator. Heater does not work. And very dim lighting on speedometer.*ak
The hood IS held up with a thin metal rod and placed into a hole in the hood. There are several holes to put the rod into but only one IS proper size and fit. If you are under the hood and you or someone else accidentally bumps the rod, then you will have your head or hands literally chopped off since the weight of the hood IS so heavy due to heavy metal plates placed in there for front end crash protection. I complained to the ford company in 1986 but they just laughed as well as nhtsa. also my car had one of the runaway problems whereby the car would just take off on its own down the street at 90 mph with both fee on the brakes. The dealer laughed and said I was the only one that complained. Nhtsa had 500 complaints on file for that problem. I wrote certified letter to pres of ford and told him that of my car injured or killed anyone that he would be found guilty of criminal negligence. 2 weeks later I got a new computer that solved that problem. my car was kept in showroom mint condition and was stolen in 1999. *jb
The bracket that hold the straps for the fuel tank rusted very badly, broke and the feul tank dropped while the car was moving/ dragged and ripped a hole in the gas tank the sparks could have lit the gas on fire and potentaily could have killed my wife and son in the car.the rest of the car IS in good shape very little rust .why was the brackets the first thing to give when it should have been the last thing to rust ?could they be defective I want to emphesize that there IS very little rust any where else but what could have been the most deadly problem I could have had was the first problem that I had whith rust. *ak
Vehicle does not contain safety glass on side windows, vehicle collision resulting in cuts to face due to glass.
Driver side seat track and anchors make clicking noise when in incline postion and falls back. *ak
Seat belt buckle release button broke. *Sd
When driving car stalls. Please describe . *ak
Ignition switch has burning smell coming from under dash; kills battery. *ak
The vehicle caught on fire from the ignition area while driving. Please describe. *ak
The light for speedometer IS out, cannot read speed day or night, creates potential for accident. tt
Driver's shoulder/lap belt buckles inoperative, male won't stay latched into female portion. tt
Front brakes failed twice, back brakes fell off. tt
Driver's side seatbelt does not clasp. tt
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Summary of information from manufacturer:ford believes that the al-leged defect only occurs in a small number of the subject vehicles andrecalled about 195,732 1984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986.analysis: vehicles potentially involved include tempo/topaz, escort/lynx/exp, mustang/capri, ltd/marquis, and thunderbird/cougar.ford sold about 110,000 replacement mio bolts, mainly for 1983 and 1984models. Low clamping force appears to be a large part of the problem.ford increased the torque requirements and required the use of a manualtorque tool in march and september 1985 production changes. 1987 modelswill be produced with a longer M10 bolt and a nut to increase and main-tain clamping force. Bolts were formerly self tapping. Reports listedabove specifically state that the bolt broke. None refer simply toseat back collapse alone.status:ford reply to odi ir dated 2/2/87.ford recalled 195,7321984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986 (86v-082). Analyzing reponse,monitoring canadian progress. Response to 4/6/87 letter to fordreceived 7/15/87. Will probably close after canada completes theiractions.===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.