1984 Mercury Lynx
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Mercury › Lynx › 1984
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1984 Mercury Lynx. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
3 recalls name the 1984 Mercury Lynx. Newest first.
External cracks above the number 3 cylinder (1984 models) or rocker arm cover gaskets splitting (1985 models) could allow oil to leak onto the exhaust manifold.
Engine oil leaking onto a hot exhaust manifold couldresult in an engine compartment fire.
Replace cracked cylinder heads (1984 models); replace rocker arm cover gaskets (1985 models).
The brake line may be positioned too close to an engine bracket. Normal engine movements may cause the bracket to rub against the brake line.
The brake line will be inspected and rerouted if necessary.
The bolts that attach the d-shaped ring for the shoulder belt are inadequately supported by the material in which they are mounted. The attachment does not comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 210, "seat belt assembly anchorages".
Dealers will install new attaching hardware to improve the strength of the mounting.
While traveling and without any indication vehicle would stall. dealer has replaced ignition module four times. *Ak dealer repllaced ignition module four times a t the owner's expence. *yh
Vehicle fire.
Aluminum cylinder head gaskets cracked and leaked oil onto exhaust manifold involved in recall no. 89V095000. tt
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
===
Rear seat belt compliance
No safety defect trend has been detected.===
Summary of information from manufacturer:the alleged fires result froma variety of causes.fire rate remains about the same despite majorchanges with 85-1/2 models.it believes that the fire rate IS less thanindustry average.mfgr request copies of specific fire reports for trendanalysis.analysis:several areas of fire origin are mentioned.engine firesallegedly caused by leakage of flammable fluids (oil, gas, trans fluid).catalytic converters frequently cited as overheating.certain modelsare reported at a greater frequency.exp turbo reported most often on aper unit basis.status: ir sent 2/19/88. Awaiting response.===
Summary of information from manufacturer:ford believes that the al-leged defect only occurs in a small number of the subject vehicles andrecalled about 195,732 1984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986.analysis: vehicles potentially involved include tempo/topaz, escort/lynx/exp, mustang/capri, ltd/marquis, and thunderbird/cougar.ford sold about 110,000 replacement mio bolts, mainly for 1983 and 1984models. Low clamping force appears to be a large part of the problem.ford increased the torque requirements and required the use of a manualtorque tool in march and september 1985 production changes. 1987 modelswill be produced with a longer M10 bolt and a nut to increase and main-tain clamping force. Bolts were formerly self tapping. Reports listedabove specifically state that the bolt broke. None refer simply toseat back collapse alone.status:ford reply to odi ir dated 2/2/87.ford recalled 195,7321984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986 (86v-082). Analyzing reponse,monitoring canadian progress. Response to 4/6/87 letter to fordreceived 7/15/87. Will probably close after canada completes theiractions.===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.