1984 Ford Escort
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Ford › Escort › 1984
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1984 Ford Escort. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
3 recalls name the 1984 Ford Escort. Newest first.
External cracks above the number 3 cylinder (1984 models) or rocker arm cover gaskets splitting (1985 models) could allow oil to leak onto the exhaust manifold.
Engine oil leaking onto a hot exhaust manifold couldresult in an engine compartment fire.
Replace cracked cylinder heads (1984 models); replace rocker arm cover gaskets (1985 models).
The brake line may be positioned too close to an engine bracket. Normal engine movements may cause the bracket to rub against the brake line.
The brake line will be inspected and rerouted if necessary.
The bolts that attach the d-shaped ring for the shoulder belt are inadequately supported by the material in which they are mounted. The attachment does not comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 210, "seat belt assembly anchorages".
Dealers will install new attaching hardware to improve the strength of the mounting.
When the gas pedal was pressed there was a delay in acceleration. the consumer had to slam on the gas pedal to get the vehicle to move. the vehicle would lunge forward unexpectedly. the vehicle was taken tot he dealer who stated that the fuel injectors were carbonated up. *nlm
The seat belt broke, there was a recall regarding the issue, however consumer was never informed.*jb
Vacuum pump (brakes) housing IS broken and pump does not work. contacted ford in sept 2001 but have had no success in them helping to locate this part. no salvage yard or auto parts store has it. car IS in very good condition but it would be very dangerous to drive with brakes in this condition.
While driving vehicle it just stopped running withoutwarning. consumer took vehicle to dealer, and they stated it was the ignition. when the tfi overheated it caused the vehicle to stop running. also, driver's side seatbelt will not connect. passenger's side seatback broke and will not go up. please provide any further information. *Ak
Nhtsa recall# 09v095000/ manufacturer's recall 89s66. Consumer got a recall notice on vehicle, and dealer didn't have parts. also, dealer will put another engine in consumer's vehicle, but consumer had to pay 1300.00 out of pocket for exhaust that goes with engine.*ak
Recall 89v095000; engine gaskets; when the recall was issued gilbert took the vehicle into kendall motors. kendall motors inspected the vehicle and ther was no problem. now ther IS a leakage coming and caused by the recalled part and kendall motors will not repair the problem. *ak
Vehicle fire. *Dh
Electrical short in the ignition switch, causing the vehicle to catch fire in the engine compartment. *ak *slc
Ignition switch shorted, causing fire. *Dsh
Due to an electrical short in the ignition switch the vacuum pump failed. *ak
Electrical short or shock in the ignition switch, causing the vehicle to catch on fire. *ak
Vehicle stalled on the highway, driver shifted to neutral, tried to restart and vehicle caught on fire. *ak
Vehicle was driven and parked, under the hood engine compartment fire. *ak
Consumer was driving car an it died and caught on fire . Please describe . *ak
Rear seat belt retractor mechanism has failed, difficult to latch seat belts. *ak
Vehicle fire around the steering wheel. *ak
Cracked engine gasket prior to recall (89v-095). *ak
Vehicle fire, 2ND vehicle from 489423. *tw
Wiring harness failure. *aw
Plastic sleeve covering front seat belt buckles failed, broken pieces fell in the latching mechanism. tt
Engine head/cylinder rocker arm cover gasket split causing coolant to leak prior to recall, also fumes emminated out of the back (89v-095).
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
===
Rear seat belt compliance
No safety defect trend has been detected.===
Summary of information from manufacturer:the alleged fires result froma variety of causes.fire rate remains about the same despite majorchanges with 85-1/2 models.it believes that the fire rate IS less thanindustry average.mfgr request copies of specific fire reports for trendanalysis.analysis:several areas of fire origin are mentioned.engine firesallegedly caused by leakage of flammable fluids (oil, gas, trans fluid).catalytic converters frequently cited as overheating.certain modelsare reported at a greater frequency.exp turbo reported most often on aper unit basis.status: ir sent 2/19/88. Awaiting response.===
Stalling
Summary of information from manufacturer:ford believes that the al-leged defect only occurs in a small number of the subject vehicles andrecalled about 195,732 1984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986.analysis: vehicles potentially involved include tempo/topaz, escort/lynx/exp, mustang/capri, ltd/marquis, and thunderbird/cougar.ford sold about 110,000 replacement mio bolts, mainly for 1983 and 1984models. Low clamping force appears to be a large part of the problem.ford increased the torque requirements and required the use of a manualtorque tool in march and september 1985 production changes. 1987 modelswill be produced with a longer M10 bolt and a nut to increase and main-tain clamping force. Bolts were formerly self tapping. Reports listedabove specifically state that the bolt broke. None refer simply toseat back collapse alone.status:ford reply to odi ir dated 2/2/87.ford recalled 195,7321984 tempo/topaz vehicles in june 1986 (86v-082). Analyzing reponse,monitoring canadian progress. Response to 4/6/87 letter to fordreceived 7/15/87. Will probably close after canada completes theiractions.===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.