2002 GMC Yukon Denali
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › GMC › Yukon Denali › 2002
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2002 GMC Yukon Denali. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
1 recall names the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali. Newest first.
Certain poli-auto combination headlamp assemblies, p/nos. 11-728, 11-728d, 11-710, 11-419, 11-713, 11-703, 11-704, 11-708p, 11-735, 11-725, 11-726, 11-716 (p&c), 11-721-1, 11-733, 11-729, 11-730, and 11-732, sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to…
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Poli-auto will notify owners and offer to repurchase the headlamps at its original purchase price. the recall IS expected to begin during april 2006. owners may contact poli-auto at 305-477-1356.
Add me to the check your airbag lawsuit
For the second time in an approximate 12 month period, I had to replace a brake line failure. until now, I didn't know that gm has a "replacement rebuild kit". however, the first time my sister was driving and had a brake failure with a car load of family aboard, in jacksonville fl. A nationally known company replaced the portion of the brake line that ruptured, but they did warn me that rust was rampart because of the salt. yesterday, I was driving to work on I495, d.c. Beltway at 50 mph, where thousands of people travel daily and I had another catastrophic brake failure at 50 mph. that scenario, just thinking about it again, scared me half to death and I just fixed the same thing last year for 600.00+ and unexpectedly it happens again. only by the grace of god, no one was injured or killed or had substantial property damage. what I found out later after investigating this problem, and the same company who replaced the first brake line said it would be 1500.00 to fix a portion of the brake line. this issue IS well known by gm and has been investigated for 5 years and gm did not do a recall because most warranties have expired. however, with the snow-belts states salting the roads have damaged many gm and other vehicles. from 1999 to 2007 gm trucks and suvs were using non-pv coated brake lines. by these brake lines not being coated with protectant, corrosion runs rampart on your brake line system, this IS probable in all the aforementioned vehicles. I think that every dealer should do this replacement for the gm recommend price. I talked to my service manager at chevy/gm today and he said gm doesn't own this dealership and the recommended time to install (4.5 hours) @ 100.00 per hour IS not realistic. I said you sale and service these vehicles, yet no one wants to step up to fix them until some gets killed, that's ridiculous.
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. While driving approximately 20 mph, the contact applied the brakes, but the anti lock brakes activated independently. The anti lock brake warning light illuminated. The failure recurred multiple times. The contact independently removed the anti lock brake fuse. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the vehicle experienced the failure listed in nhtsa campaign number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic); however, the vin was not included. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 200,000.
While approaching a stop sign I attempted to apply the brakes. The brakes went to the floor. I pumped them repeatedly which did not help much at all. I was not able to slow down, much less stop at the stop sign. With no choice, I rounded the turn at a high rate of speed. Thankfully the approaching vehicle was able to avoid me. Had I arrived at the intersection a few seconds later the result would have likely been different. as this occurred late at night with almost no traffic, I was able to get the vehicle home at a slow rate of speed with heavy brake pumping. Upon inspection in my driveway I was able to determine that a corroded brake line that leads to the rear brakes had burst. The placement of this part on top of the frame rail prevents inspection by owners. *tr
While driving our 2002yukon denali with 105,000 miles we had brake failure for the second time. We were towing our 21 foot gulf stream amerilite travel trailer and when the vehicle in front of us stepped on their brakes my husband attempted to begin slowing down. The brake pedal went all the way to the floor, we had no brakes. It IS a miracle that we were not killed. This IS the second brake line rupture within the past two years since we have owned this vehicle. The vehicle IS extemely well maintained. We could have been killed. It has been very expensive to have our vehicle towed twice and repaired. I will be contacting GMC and asking for reimbursement. Our lives and the lives of many others have been put in danger here. Why IS their not a recall with so many postings of the this problem? All of the brake lines should be replaced with stainless steel lines that will not rust. I am looking forward to your response prior to contacting an attorney. Thank you. *tr
During routine maintenance on my 2002 yukon denali, heavy rust/corrosion was first identified on the brake line that runs under the radiator. As I followed it back, more rust/corrosion IS visible. They are rusting/corroding in exposed as well as protected areas. concerned for safety and a potential failure I started to investigate, on line, and found that this issue has affected many trucks and suv's in and around my model year. I also found that gm IS aware of the issue but has failed to initiate a recall. vehicles of this size are purchased for large families, towing and hauling heavy loads. All the more reason for gm to recognize the potential danger and act accordingly. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon. The contact stated that the ignition failed and it took several attempts to get the ignition switch into the start position. The contact's personal mechanic advised that the ignition switch needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 90,000 and the current mileage was 148,809.
Rear brake line failed while driving. Car towed to van chevrolet in scottsdale, az. Dealer only replaced one failed line. Approx. 1 year later, front left line failed, again while driving, and was replaced. After inspection all hard brake lines are severely corroded and need replacement. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. The contact stated while driving approximately 15 mph, the brakes were depressed and the vehicle failed to slow down until the brake pedal was applied repeatedly. The contact stated that prior to the failure while shifting from park into reverse, the pedal traveled to the floorboard upon engagement. The technician informed the contact that the entire brake and fuel lines were severely corroded. The vehicle was in the process of being repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 135,000.
I was exiting the freeway and started to brake and then the pedal went to the floor. I had the stand on it to slow down enough to keep from hitting the car in front of me. upon examination of the vehicle I found a ruptured brake line. further review found all 4 lines 8 inches below the master cylinder and lower seriously corroded. fluid reservoir was still full of fluid. the line broke out under the carriage, front driver side, just behind the front wheel well. pictures are available of the corroded lines. *tr
Brakes failed due to corrosion of the brake line. Braking was not existent as the pedal travels to the floor. Thank god for not being in a busy street and being able to coast to a stop. This IS a heavy vehicle and without braking ability it could easily kill people. After adding some brake fluid (most of which leaked through the broken line) there's not even a warning light on to alert of a braking problem despite the fact that the pedal goes to the floor. The other important point to note IS that the failure in the line appears to have happened in a part of the line that appears to be inside the car frame which makes it the most protected line from the outside elements. If that's the first line to fail, it would suggest sub standard materials being used in manufacturing these lines. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. The contact stated the spare tire separated from the vehicle while driving. The contact examined the vehicle and noticed that the spare tire cable failed to secure the due to corrosion. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and the current miles were 65,000. updated 11/03/11*lj updated 11/23/11
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. the contact stated that while braking, the ABS system would engage and cause the brakes to lock up. the contact stated that this occurs at low speeds and could cause a crash. the contact has not taken the vehicle to a dealer or local mechanic. the contact stated the vehicle was unsafe to drive. the failure mileage was 167,000.
TL* the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. The contact stated when driving at approximately 3-10 mph and applying the brakes, the anti-lock braking system (ABS) would engage. The dealer advised although there was a recall for the failure (nhtsa campaign ID 05v379000: service brakes, hydraulic: antilock), his vin was not included. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 53,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 GMC yukon denali. While driving at a speed of 5 mph he suddenly lost the power assist in the steering wheel. As pressure was applied to the steering wheel it would break free to turn and then reset itself. The vehicle was taken to the dealership where the contact was informed that the failure could not be reproduced. The current and failure mileages were 74,000. updated 04-15-10 *bf the consumer stated after having a conversation with gm and the dealer a new power steering pump was ordered. The power steering pump was replaced on april 13TH. Updated 05/05/10.*jb
Anti-lock brake failure on 2002 yukon denali in michigan. my vehicle IS experiencing the problem of the recall. though my vehicle falls under the recall. gm IS refusing to fix my vehicle because my particular vehicle does not show up in the gm computer system as requiring the recall. please get gm to put vehicle required by recall in their system. *Tr
I have a 2002 yukon denali AWD. I took a long trip this week for vacation and noticed that the ABS light as been coming on and off, and now its on all the time. Whenever im moving at low speeds it tends to pulse when I brake or have the ABS activate making an easy slow stop become and long stop that has made me swerve to miss many near collisions in the past few days. Im also hearing a knocking sound at low speeds in the drive side wheel only when I turn right, between the 2 that have just recently appeared made my 900 mile trip a nightmare, not knowing what it IS. I've researched the problem online and notice there was a recall in canada for the same problem and that the complaints are not high enough to get it in the u.s. So how many ppl need to risk being injured or killed for gm to do the right thing. They obviously no something IS wrong and IS not willing to help the consumers. Thanks *tr
Antilock brakes pulse and make activation noise at low speed regardless of road conditions. *tr
I own a 2002 GMC yukon denali and little by little the lights behind the instruments on the dash and steering wheel buttons have blown out. The dealer said the only replacement would be for the entire units and I would have to pay for it. Components work fine but cannot see at night which makes driving and trying to figure out the instruments are difficult.*jb
Dt*: the contact stated while traveling 10 mph, the ABS engaged. there was a nhtsa recall, # 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. the vehicle was not included in the recall due to the vin.
While parking the truck the parking brake went to the floor and does not hold the truck from moving , even after parking in the driveway. Mechanic stated that this IS common problem with these trucks and may need to replace rotors and pads depending on severity. This should be recalled since this seems to be a recurring problem as noted in other complaints. Don't have large sum of money to correct with new part costs. *Jb
Dt*: the contact stated the air bags did not deploy in a frontal impact accident at 50 mph. the air bag warning light was not illuminating prior to the accident. the dealership told the contact to call the manufacturer. the vehicle was totaled as a result of the accident. The contact sustained. Injuries. The police were notified, and a report was taken. *Ak
I own a 2002 yukon denali, and my ABS kicks in at low speeds. there IS already a recall for this issue but my [xxx] excludes me to obtain this recall. I own a 2002 yukon denali, I live in the "salt belt" states (new jersey), I am experiancing unwanted ABS activation at low speeds, my vin does not match the suv's mentioned for this recall. I meet all quailifations for this recall except one (my vin). so my SUV IS not covered. *nm updated 07/17/2012 *js information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(B)(6)
ABS system always activates when it shouldn't at slow speeds, resulting in increased stopping distances. *nm
I had to replace a set of rear disc rotors that were rusted on inside disc walls. Will not pass inspection. *ak
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Odi's review of complaint data received since the close of ea04-011 revealed no indication that the investigation should be re-opened.more details can be found in the federal register notice enclosed in the dp05-009 public file.odi reserves the right to reopen the investigation in the future should conditions warrant.
In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (ABS) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted ABS activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v-379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. The population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v-379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). The corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.