1987 Ford Taurus
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Ford › Taurus › 1987
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1987 Ford Taurus. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
9 recalls name the 1987 Ford Taurus. Newest first.
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles originally sold or currently registered in connecticut, delaware, district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kansas, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, nebraska, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, virginia, west virgnia, and…
If both rear corners drop, steering would become suddenly very difficult, affecting vehicle control and increasing the risk of a crash.
Dealers will install subframe rear mount bolts, reinforcement plates, and plate nuts.
The arc welds on the sway bar bracket, where it attaches to the strut reserve tube, did not fuse properly.
Over time, a portion of the bracket can tear away from the strut, falling into and puncturing the tire or causing damage to the wheel, which could result in an accident.
Monroe dealers will replace the strut free of charge.
Vehicle description: taurus and sables built from 10-14-85 through 8-19-88, and lincoln continentals built from 11-4-87 through 9-30-88 (except 1989 - 1991 2.5L taurus and 1989 - 1992 sho). The affected cars were originally sold or currently registered in the following states: connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, massachusetts, michigan, new hampshire…
If one of the rear corners drops, only minor indications of a malfunction such as a clunking noise or slight change in steering wheel alignment are noticeable. however, if both rear corners of the subframe drop, steering becomes very difficult, which could adversely affect vehicle control and possibly result in an accident.
Install a corrosion-resistant reinforcing plate and a new bolt on both rear subframe mounts. this recall campaign has been superseded by recall 98v-323.
Children can accidentally lock themselves in the footwell area of the rear-facing third seat, or in the storage compartment in station wagons not equipped with an optional third seat. Once the compartment IS closed it cannot be opened from the inside.
There IS a danger of air deprivation, hyperthermia,and/or panic response to a child who has locked himself or herself into thecompartment, with the possibility of asphyxiation.
Replace the self-latching assembly currently used in the rear storage compartment with a latch assembly that can only be closed with a key.
Front disc brake rotors of the subject vehicles may experience severe corrosion if operated in areas where calcium chloride and sodium chloride are used extensively.
Severely corroded rotors may fracture or separate nearthe inner edges of the brake discs resulting in reduced braking effectiveness,higher than normal pedal efforts, loud grinding noises, and moderate pulls whenthe brakes are applied. Reduced braking effectiveness may increase minimumstopping distances, possibly resulting in an accident.
Replace front brake rotors with full cast front brake rotors.
Spring lock fuel line coupling may not be properly engaged.
Coupling could disengage due to fuel pressure,vibration, and engine movements; this would cause loss of fuel which, inpresence of an ignition source, creates a fire risk.
Install retainer clips over the couplings to prevent coupling separation and fuel leakage.
Road salt induced erosion of the wiper motor conductor strips could cause localized thermal stress within the glass.
Glass could fracture while station wagon IS being drivenor parked, creating a risk of injury to occupants or sudden distraction to thedriver.
Apply sealant to conductor strips and protective tape to lower backlites.
Left and/or right rear spindle assemblies may have been improperly heat treated. consequence of defect: if spindle stem separates, loss of vehicle control could occur without prior warning.
Steering shaft assemblies contain lower shafts of insufficient length for proper attachment to the shaft insulator flange. consequence of defect: shaft could separate, resulting in total loss of steering control and a possible accident.
1987 ford taurus. Consumer states sub frame both left side and right side of the front end broke off while driving *tgw the dealer informed the consumer his model year had been recalled for the exact problem he experienced. Ford motor co. Stated they would assume no responsibility. *Jb
Dt: the contact states that the 1987 ford taurus station wagon experienced a very violent acceleration. While driving along at 30 mph the vehicle raced. The contact then put foot on the brake and the car skidded and the car would not stop, and began going faster. The hand brake was pulled. The brake was pulled so hard that something broke and started leaking. The contact pulled it out of drive and put it into park, and the car was still going. The contact made it to a gas station and was finally able to stall the car. the car was left at the gas station and left for someone to bring the car home. The vehicle was taken to the dealership, and the mechanic at the dealership told her that he would not drive the car because it may take off with him. The dealer said that they could do a diagnostic check on the vehicle, but it would be expensive. the contact can not afford to have all the testing done . Ford has been called, but they did not have any free remedy to offer. The driver was extremely scared and has suffered heart problems since the incident.*ak updated 11/29/2005 - *nm
Due to a known defect and failure of the seat belt of my 1987 ford taurus, I went head first into the windshield, my knees hit the dashboard, and I suffered injuries. It would be a simple fix for ford to correct the known defect in this vehicle. The manufacturer did nothing to protect the public. I could have easily been killed. *Jb
Failure of ignition switch and plug assembly due to overheating. switch melted and so did plug assembly. This same repair was previously done at approximately 100,000 miles. when vehicle was purchased at appoximately 87,000 miles, it was observed that this repair had been done previous to that time as well. this IS a chronic failure. any tsb's or recalls on this matter? related problem: excessive current draw on alternator output wire to starter solenoid (battery) causing wire to run hot (with alternator turning). this has resulted in fusible link g blowing open twice.
I was driving and the transmission slip and then went out and now can't even drive it. *nlm
I am driving and my car stops running. It just dies, I put it in park and it starts again. This IS dangerous especially when I am in heavy traffic.*jb
Reply to request for a list of recalls that affect 1987 ford taurus and 1993 mercury sable vehicles. sent summary listing of recalls to consumer and referred consumer to npo-230 for consumer complaint listings. 1993 mercury sable/vin#lmel5549pg610694.*scc *jb
The vehicle stalls occasionally when on warm trips longer than a mile. the consumer stated that the manufacturer installed the ignition system component, tfi-iv module knowing that it could fail when the vehicle overheats. *yh
When coming to a stop vehicle shutsdown. Took vehicle to dealer. *ak consumer states vehicle IS now having transmission problems, the fuel line injection system was replaced, various electrical componets including the ignition system and windshield wiper was replaced. *Mj
While driving consumer smelled something burning underneath dash around ignition. Vehicle stalled and lost all power. Had towed. Replaced links in ignition. Problem recurred again . Dealer contacted
While driving fan does not come on. vehicle starts to overheat. Has to continuously put anti- freeze in the vehicle every 15 miles. Please provide any further information.*ak
Tfi module went out and cost me a lot of money and towing service and ruined my birthday party and I would like to get all my money back I paid the ford dealership here in los banos where they took advantage be cause I was a women and they new all the time there was a bad tfi module recall they said the judge was out of their juridiction. *Ak
Transmission failed to shift. *Ak
Seat belts came apart and failed to restrain driver and passengers side.
While driving 30 mph vehicle stalled. towed to repair shop, and ignition module had failed, and needed to be replaced.*ak
Expected engine life in miles, expected transmision life in miles. *Ak
After driving for a mile, parked vehicle and minutes later found out that vehicle was on fire. dealer nor fire department could determine what was the cause fire.*ak possible eingine failure. *slc
Vehicle was parked inside of a mall in a parking lot. consumer didn't turn vehicle on, and there were flames and sparks coming from underneath vehicle. vehicle burned down to the ground. *Ak
Headlamp assemblies are hazy, difficult to see at night even with high beams; interior door handles keep breaking, exterior handle broke once; headrest won't stay up.*ak
Engine stalling while driving and would not restart. Vehicle taken to dealer's shop, and problem has reoccurred. *ak after several repairs, the consumer found out on internet the tfi module on ford taurus was on recall. the dealer had never told the consumer about the recall and the consumer wants reimbursement for expenses. the dealer service manager said the court judge had no right to recall these cars. *Yh
Rear restraint buckle separated, causing occupant to be unrestrained. dealer will be notified. *ak
At 50,000 miles headlight lens commenced to fog up and and caused poor visibility. Dealer notified, and still unwilling to help. Feel free to provide any further details on this matter. *Ak
When foot IS put on gas pedal engine rises up. dlr said it needed motor mounts.*ak
Vehicle has unintended acceleration intermittently,gas pedal will drop to floor. Consumer must kick gas pedal to disengage it. It feels like cruise control IS taking over. *ak the problelm occured again but the dealer could not duplicate. *yh
Vehicle was sitting in front of consumer's house and noticed that front driver's side tire tread had separated from rim. kelly springfield, aqua tur tire, p205/70/r14, dot#pjkef8kr435. *ak consumer states that 4 tires have experienced this, 2 of the tires were covered under a recall. *slc
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
To determine whether the cars that were not included in the safety recall 93v-106 should be recalled due to the same failure phenomenon, and to determine if there IS remedy failure issue
Alleged defective tie rods
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
===
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
===
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
===
===
Summary:the loss of vehicle control appears to be the potentialconsequence of a seat bracket failure.===
Summary: owners complain of exhaust gases, including hydrogen sulfide,leaking into the passenger compartment causing nausea, headaches, anddiscomfort.hydrogen sulfide (H2S) IS a colorless, flammable, andvery poisonous gas.===
Briefing notes odiscussion of the reported defect & its consequences ofailure mileage analysis owarranty data analysis oford's body & chassis engineering report ocomparison with other seat-track analyses===
===
===
===
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.