2006 Mercedes Benz E320
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Mercedes Benz › E320 › 2006
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 2006 Mercedes Benz E320. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
4 recalls name the 2006 Mercedes Benz E320. Newest first.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2001-2011 C-Class, CLK, E-Class, and CLS vehicles. Please see the recall report for a complete list of models and model years. The glass sunroof panel may not be properly secured and can detach.
A detached sunroof panel can become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
Dealers will inspect and replace the sunroof panel as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed January 10, 2025. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. This recall is an expansion of previous NHTSA recall number 22V-954. MBUSA's number for this recall is 2024120001/2/3.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2001-2011 C-Class, CLK, E-Class, and CLS vehicles. Please refer to MBUSA's recall report for specific vehicle model details. The glass sunroof panel may not be properly secured and may detach.
A detached sunroof panel may become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
Dealers will inspect and replace the sunroof panel as necessary free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed February 3, 2023. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. This recall expands NHTSA recall number 19V-918. MBUSA's numbers for this recall are 2023010004, 2023010005, and 2023010006.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2006-2007 C350, C230, C280, CLK350, E320CDI, E350 Wagon, E350, 2006 C55 AMG, CLK500, CLS500, CLS55 AMG, E500 Wagon, E500, E55 AMG, 2007 CLK550, CLS550, CLS63 AMG, E550, E63 AMG, and E63 Wagon AMG vehicles. The bonding between the glass panel and the sliding roof frame may deteriorate, possibly causing…
A detached glass panel can separate from the vehicle and become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
MBUSA will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the glass panel bonding and replace the sliding roof, as necessary, free of charge. Owner letters were mailed May 7, 2021. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. This recall is an expansion of recall number 19V-918. MBUSA's number for this recall is 2021040012.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2001-2011 vehicles. The bonding between the glass panel and the sliding roof frame may deteriorate, possibly resulting in the glass panel detaching from the vehicle. For a full list of the affected models visit: https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2019/RMISC-19V918-4126.pdf
A detached glass panel can separate from the vehicle and become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
MBUSA will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the glass panel bonding and replace the sliding roof, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began July 10, 2020. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. MBUSA's number for this recall is 2020040011.
Vehicle had a blow out on highway. Pull onto right shoulder doing about 60mph. Pressed the brakes and would not stop. Kept pressing brake and pumping the brakes and would not stop. was going around 50mph on the shoulder. After 15 seconds of pressing the brakes, car decided to brake. Checked brake lines, brake fluid and everything was correct and not leaking and drove the car back home slowly with spare on. ESP and ABS error came on. No other warning came on.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 mercedes-benz E320. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 19v918000 (visibility) however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The dealer was not contacted. the manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
While driving, with short beeps , the sbc in my W211 gives a short warning and fails completely. It IS very risky to drive after that. With such an expensive car the reliability has been compromised. If there IS a recall it would help many owners.
In january 2018, my car had developed sbc malfunction issues and I took it to the and they quoted me $ 2,700+/- to fix the issue. I then called mb USA and they told me that the sbc unit warranty was extended for 10yrs and that I had just crossed that limit. I then reached out to a private mechanic who agreed to replace the unit for $865 (please see the attached receipt). I was able to purchase the sbc unit from mb of clear lake for $1,045.70 . Thus, I was able to get the car repair and save my self about $1,000 as mb was not covering its repair. on september 2018 I received a letter from mb USA, indicating that the cost of the repair IS reimbursable. I reached out to the dealer and provided all the documents that they requested. However, I was told the repair can be reimbursed only if it was done by an authorized dealer. I believe this IS not a fairway to resolve the issue when all the relevant documents are available for a legitimate reimbursable. Mb I believe IS not acting in good faith and I need your assistance in recovering my due refund for a faulty sbc unit. I have sent a letter to mb USA and they reached out to me with the answer, "not unless repair done by an authorized dealer" thank you.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 mercedes-benz E320. While operating the vehicle, the service brake indicator illuminated and the vehicle would not immediately stop when the brake pedal was depressed. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who replaced the brake pads and brake rotors, but the failures continued. The manufacturer and local dealer were not notified of the failures. The failure mileage was 127,000.
My airbags self deployed while I was driving. I had just left work and driving northbound on the west sam houston tollway approaching the toll station at highway speeds. there was an incredibly loud explosion and and hard percussion as the airbags self deployed while I was driving. I thought I had been punched or shot in the gut. The passenger side curtain dropped down and the right rear passenger side door bag deployed. the seatbelt around my waist and shoulder tightened. Fortunately, I kept it together and drove directly to the dealership. I had not hit anything, run over a pothole, swerved or otherwise make any sudden direction change. I was immediately called by an operator on the mercedes emergency system within the car. so mercedes IS aware of the incident at the time it happened. she asked if I needed an ambulance or police. I told her that the airbags had deployed on their own and that I was physically ok. additionally, I drove immediately to star motor dealership where they looked at my vehicle less than 20 minutes after it occurred. the service adviser and some of the technicians quickly looked at the vehicle (it was near closing time). they said they could not read the codes other than the srs fault. I was advised that it would likely be cheaper to fix at a body shop than at the dealer. I later found that the driver side rear seatbelt had also deployed and was tightened.
TL* the contact owns a 2006 mercedes-benz E320. The contact stated that the brake warning indicator illuminated. The vehicle was manufactured so that after the brake pedal was depressed over 300,000 times, the brakes would fail. The contact took the vehicle to a certified mechanic who diagnosed that the sbc brake unit failed. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer stated that it was a known failure and extended the warranty an additional 10 years; however, the contact's vehicle surpassed the warranty extension by six months. The manufacturer advised the contact to have the vehicle towed to a dealer for diagnostic testing. The approximate failure mileage was 149,000.
Car has "sensotronic braking system", sbc, that upon failure renders the car unsafe as only the front wheel brakes will have partial hydraulic power to stop the car. ref: mb bulletin "s142.46-p-0012a" failure occurs without prior warning or brake degradation. my car has had several transitory failures as I was driving. only turning off the key and then back on again did I regain normal braking. also upon sbc failure the brake pedal almost goes down to the floor with a functioning reversion to "hydraulic mode." mercedes benz should immediately recall and replace all sbc units asap to eliminate this "time bomb." *tr
Persistent smell of diesel in cabin after filling tank. Leak isolated to right side (passenger side) fuel sender cap under rear seats. Same as gasoline versions, this really happens in the cdi or diesel versions as well. The warranty extension/recall should apply to these cars as well!
I was involved in an accident sat. April 9, 2016. I struck another vehicle that was stopped dead still in the road. My air bags did not deploy . I was traveling at a speed over 30 miles an hour but less than 45 mph and the impact was dead on, no glancing blow. The accident happened on a state highway about 10 p.m.
Fuel IS leaking out of my E320 cdi, there IS also an intense fuel smell, it appears to be the same exact issue that the nhtsa previously ordered mercedes to replace the fuel tanks on all 2003-2009 e-class mercedes, but mercedes says it only applies to gasoline engines.
The insulation covering the electrical wiring that powers the low beam headlights on both passenger and driver sides has failed and crumbled away exposing the bare copper wire. This circuit powers two halogen 55 watt bulbs (110 watts total or ~10 amps) at 12 volts. The insulation failure will present an immediate vehicle fire hazard if the electrical protection fuse fails to actuate as a result of the short circuit created by potential bare wire contact. If the electrical protection fuse does actuate properly the car will lose forward illumination which IS essential for safe vehicle operation at night. In either instance a property and personal hazard can result from this defect. this defect can be traced directly to the wire mercedes benz selected for the manufacture of this circuitry. Either the gauge of the wire selected IS insufficient to dissipate the heat generated by the current flow the circuit demands or the insulation of the wire selected IS inherently defective as evidenced by its crumbling deterioration for a component that should be expected to last the life of the vehicle. In either case this wiring failure constitutes a manufacturing defect which should be subject to recall and correction by the manufacturer at his expense. the defect was discovered while attempting to replace a failed low beam headlight bulb, a maintenance activity that can reasonably be expected to be performed a number of times during the vehicle's lifespan. The defective insulation was immediately evident by visual and tactile observation. It was immediately clear an immediate hazard was present and that the lighting could not be used rendering the vehicle unsafe to operate under condition when the lighting circuit might be operated.
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. When this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. This occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. . Mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. At the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. This IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed.
While driving I got this warning " brake service brake visit workshop.(color black)" I went to a certified mercedes benz shop and got a computer diagnosis stating that the problem was in the power supply accumulation of the sensotronic brake control (sbc) and was advised to take the car to a dealer, I never received from mercedes-benz a letter about a recall of this problem.
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. When this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. This occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. I have sent a copy of the mercedes service bulletin s142.46-p-0012a which addresses this issue. Mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. At the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. This IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed.
During renewal of headlamp bulbs I found that insulation had broken off leaving substantial portion of bare conductors. Wires are in close proximity to each other and if they touch there IS the possibility of loss of lighting or electrical fire. Should this occur, while driving on a dark road, it likecould result in catastrophic crash. This IS commonly discussed by owners in the mercedes-benz forums. I am surprised that mercedes has not been forced to recall w211s from 2003 to 2009 model years. *tr
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. When this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. This occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. Mercedes service bulletin s142.46-p-0012a addresses this issue. Mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. At the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. This IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed. *tr
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. When this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. This occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. Mercedes has a service bulletin s142.46-p-0012a which addresses this issue. Mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. At the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. This IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed. *tr
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. When this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. This occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. At the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. This IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed. *tr
This vehicle IS equipped with sensotronic brake control that has a service threshold. when this threshold IS reached the brake system defaults to non power assisted hydraulic mode to the front wheels only. this occurs without any prior warning and results in increased stopping distance. I have sent a copy of the mercedes service bulletin s142.46-p-0012a to nathaniel hayes at dot.gov which addresses this issue. mercedes stopped installing this system in 2006. at the very least, mercedes should issue a mandatory recall to interrogate these vehicles with star das to determine how close to the service threshold the sbc unit IS and replace them at the dealer's expense. this IS a major safety issue that needs to be addressed. ....updated 01/23/15 *bf updated 10/6/2015*js
Filled the fuel tank with diesel. Drove 240 miles to destination. Upon arriving, smelled diesel very strong at right rear near fuel cap and under tire well. Looked under car and saw possible diesel leaking. Bought new file tank thinking that may solve but kept smelling it so I drive to mb dealer in fort pierce, fl. Dealer stated fuel tank leak with estimate of $3500. Seems to be happening on other W211 cars as well. Feel this should be a recall on the cars. This IS very much a safety issue on a supposedly "safe" car. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 2006 mercedes benz E320. The contact stated while parked and the engine turned off, a strong odor of fuel emitted inside and outside of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer, who stated that the fuel sending unit would need to be replaced. The vehicle was currently being repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The approximate failure mileage was 31,000. Pam
My 2006 e class 320 mercedes had a strong odor of gasoline. I took it to the dealer and they said it IS a fuel sending unit problem I have read that this IS a problem with this car and I should let you know that I have this problem. I am being told I have to pay $1000.00 + for this repair are they supposed to cover this? I also read there IS a recall on this car voluntary emissions recall # 2008-020001 can you please advise me I am very concerned. *tr
Near total and instantaneous brake failure, very close to hitting another car, thankfully was able to enter parking lot to stop. as soon as pedal was depressed dash illuminated red and notified of brake failure, pushing pedal to floor barely provided any braking at all. After key off cycles everything appears to be normal again. huge confidence loss in vehicle, very close to hitting another car at speed, not good. *tr
Driving over a speed bump at low speed and coil spring snapped above the spring perch. car was unable to be driven until repairs were made. *tr
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA) has reported a high number of warranty claims for air bag warning lamp illumination due to a diagnostic fault code 9103 or 9123 indicating a high resistance in the driver's frontal air bag firing circuit.MBUSA's testing and evaluation have shown that this condition is the result of a faulty connector (specifically, improper wire crimp) but that it will not prevent proper deployment of the driver's frontal air bag.The faulty connector can cause the air bag circuit resistance levels to exceed the threshold that illuminates the air bag warning lamp, but they do not exceed a higher limit at which proper deployment of the air bag may no longer occur.The agency believes that further expenditure of agency resources does not appear to be warranted at this time.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that no safety-related defect exists.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.During the investigation, ODI learned that MBUSA will initiate a warranty extension program to address the faulty connectors in subject model year 2005 and 2006 E-Class and other MBUSA model/model year vehicles.This action will extend the warranty coverage for this issue to 10 years or 100,000 miles, whichever occurs first.MBUSA will notify all affected vehicle owners of this action.A bulletin describing this program is available in the investigative file.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.