1992 Ford F-250
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Ford › F-250 › 1992
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1992 Ford F-250. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
7 recalls name the 1992 Ford F-250. Newest first.
Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. the recall began on july 1, 2006. owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
This IS not a safety recall in accordance with the safety act. however, it IS deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. vehicle description: 1990-1993 ford f-series vehicles equipped with dual fuel tanks and 4.9, 5.0,5.8, or 7.5 liter gasoline fueled engines. some vehicles can experience a cross tank fuel flow condition due to a damaged check…
Should this occur, the capacity of the receiving tank may be exceeded and fuel may overflow from the filler cap.
Ford IS extending the warranty for potential fuel cross-flow to 12 years of service or 150,000 miles from the vehicle's warranty start date, whichever occurs first. this cover will automatically transfer to subsequent owners at no charge. if a vehicle already has more than 150,000 miles, this overage will last until december 31, 2001. if the vehicle IS experiencing a fuel cross-flow condition, dealers will repair the condition free of charge.
This IS not a safety recall in accordance with the safety act. however, it IS deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. equipment description: ford IS replacing all firestone wilderness at 15, 16, and 17 inch tires mounted on ford trucks and suvs. ford reports tread separation can occur due to a combination of the sensitivity of the tire…
Should the tread separate at highway speeds, a vehicle crash could occur, possibly resulting in personal injury or death.
The replacement/reimbursement program for this campaign expired on march 31, 2002. however, customers can contact ford at 1-877-917-3673 or go on-line to www.ford.com for possible assistance.
The parking brake control self-adjust pawl does not line up properly with the self-adjust rachet causing the pawl to slip over one or more teeth in the rachet.
When the above occurs, it can result in parking brake system ineffectiveness. The parking brake will not hold the vehicle, causing the vehicle to roll freely, if the transmission IS not left in gear.
A wedge will be installed which will serve to lock the parking brake self-adjust mechanism pawl into engagement with the rachet. Also, owners will be advised to release and reapply the parking brake whenever tooth skip occurs and will be reminded to always turn off the engine and leave the vehicle in gear when the vehicle IS parked.
A malfunctioning check valve within the fuel pump assembly causes a portion of the unused fuel from one tank to be returned to the second tank. When this occurs, the capacity of the second tank can be exceeded, causing fuel spillage.
Spilled fuel can result in a fire when exposed to asource of ignition.
Replacement of the fuel pressure regulator and installation of redundant check valves.
The sound insulation on the engine side of the dash panel can contact the exhaust manifold.
Contact between the insulation and the hot exhaustmanifold may result in a engine compartment fire.
Dealers will modify the sound insulator at no cost to owners.
Water can enter the door latch release cable. If the vehicle IS operated in below freezing temperatures, the water in the door latch release cable can freeze and cause the latch mechanism to malfunction.
The malfunction of the door latch release can result inthree different problems: 1) the door will not be able to be relatched, 2) theinside door handle can become inoperative, and 3) the door could appear to belatched when it IS not, allowing the door to open unexpectedly if it IS jarred,and increasing the risk of injury to the adjacent seat occupant.
Revised door release cables and water shields will be installed.
The check valve IS bad and gas IS transferred to the front tank causing it to spill over. Some F250 from that year are under recall. Why IS mine not
TL* the contact owns a 1992 ford F-250. While driving approximately 35 mph, the vehicle started to shake. When the speed decreased to 20 mph, the vehicle stopped shaking. The failure occurred on multiple occasions. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the failure was unable to be duplicated. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 153,000. updated 02/12/16*lj *js
TL* the contact owns a 1992 ford F250. The contact stated the emergency brake would not engage. In addition, the odometer gauge was inoperable. The dealer was notified who stated that there was a recall for the failure under nhtsa campaign ID number: 94v169001 (parking brake: conventional) however, the vehicle was not included. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 91,000.
With my 3 granddaughters in the cab of my ford F250 I stopped at the bicycle shop to drop off 2 bicycles that needed repair, this took less than 5 minutes. when I returned to my truck there was no less than 1/2 galon of fuel on the pavement and fuel was still leaking out of the rear tank filler neck. I quickly took my granddaughters out of the truck to safety and had my truck towed to my mechanic. he called the ford dealer in alhambra ca. And was told of the defective valve, but there was no recall and that it would cost no less than $ 400.00 to correct. I took my truck to that same dealer the following week to have new shocks installed and was told the same thing by the shop manager. this prevents me from filling both tanks or leakage will occur. another incident occurred when a driver of another vehicle pulled me over to report that his car had fuel all over his new car and took down my information, but went to a nearby car wash, but that I would be responsible if any damage to the finish occurred. this valve problem put my family in potential grave danger and I feel that ford IS responsible to correct the problem at their expense. according to the "auto recall car report" ford has extended the warranty for 12 year or 150,000 miles. IS the dot able to help my situation and order ford to correct the fuel crossover and fuel spillage problem? *Tr
Tl*the contact owns a 1992 ford F250. the contact received a recall notice for nhtsa campaign ID number 07v336000 (vehicle speed control) on august 27, 2007. he took the vehicle to the dealer and they informed him that the parts would be unavailable until january of 2008. they advised him to deactivate his speed control switch, however, the contact refused. there had been no failure to date. the current mileage was 120,000.
Tire blowout. *Jb
Consumer parked the vehicle, went into the house, and smelled smoke. by the time the consumer could respond the windows blew out because of the fire.*ak
Consumer complained about a fuel tank problem. However, there two recalls, recall 011008000 and recall 93v125000 were issued. This vehicle wa snot included. consumer contacted the ford dealer and the manufacturer. *Ak
Nhtsa# 93-v-125-000 the vehicle experienced the same problem as stated in recall 93 v 125 000, however the dealer refused to fix. *jb
Consumer states while his wife was driving their truck, the tire on the front of the truck blew. he states that the sidewall on the tire exploded. he also states that he or his wife had hit anything prior. consumer states that the tires was suppose to be good for 50,000 miles instead he just had 20,000 miles on them. he also states that the tire was a uniroyal size LT 235 85 R/16. ts
At approx. 9:30 am, truck (with 3 pasengers and no cargo) was traveling on a dry, straight portion of highway when sudden vibration occurred at approx. 60-65 mph followed by tread separation and blowout. after regaining control of vehicle, I pulled off onto right shoulder of highway to inspect damage. my running-board and inner fenderwell sutained damage. mfr. Recommended air pressure (max. 80 psi) regularly maintained.*ak
When using emergency flasher it causes dutchman travel trailer wheels to lock up. Dealer notified. Feel free to provide any further information.*ak
Gas tanks problem. that when filling second gas tank, it will over flow into the first one. Contacted dealer, the problem has now been corrected to the consumers satisfaction. *Ak *nlm
Gas IS flowing between the dual gas tanks. when both tanks are full gas flows to the ground. Consumer feels this IS very unsafe. *ak. consumer states a portion of the unused fuel from one tank returns to the second tank, when this occurs the capacity of the second tank can be exceeded, causing fuel spillage.*jb
Clutch will slip during operation when pulling a boat out of the water and onto a trailer. also, overdrive light on the instrument panel will intermittently illuminate. dealership replaced transmission at 30,000 miles, and has changed computer codes several times. These repairs have failed to effectively remedy the problem. please provide any additional information / documentation.*ak
Engine cuts out when truck switched to rear and front tank
Replacement tires on a ford, F250, dot vnw81x, while traveling at 70 mph vehicle started to shake. consumer pulled over, and looked at front driver side tire and noticed that tread had separated from tire and rapped around axle. there was severe vehicle damage. *ak dot number vnw81xl038 experienced blowout on driver rear, dot number vnw81xl028 experienced blowout on passenger rear, all tires did damage to vehicle. *slc
Serpentine belt tensioner failed twice on vehicle while consumer was driving, consumer lost steering and brakes. Contaced dealer ,and the dealer was not willing to do anything.*ak *slc
The vehicle has a rubbing noise when making right turns dealer found that the front bumper and brackets bent allowing the tire to rub on the bummper. nlm
Gear shift shaft broke. nlm
Gear shift shaft failed when consumer shifted into drive, consumer believes this IS poorly designed. nlm
This IS the third transmissions failure caused by pre-mature torque converter bushing failure, creating excessive heat and pump melt-down and transmission failure.*ak
Rear tire on passenger's side IS showiing signs of tread separation. about an 8 inch piece of tread was coming off tire, and further up IS starting to do the same. Replacement tire equipment on a 1992, F250. Tire mileage about 16622. Bridgestone,dueler apt, tire size LT 23585r16, dot # 789jpua 315.*ak *slc
Brake line broke, there IS only more for front & back
Tread separated on pass side front. *ak (tiresize: 235 85 R16)( dot number: tire size: 235 85 R16 )
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
On july 14, 1993 ford filed a defect information report concerning fuel tank cross flow leakage on f-series light trucks and cab chassis built from july 22, 1989 through december 17, 1992.the remedy was to replace the fuel pressure regulator and install a check valve between each fuel supply line and fuel tank (2) to repair the supply side fuel cross flow problem (recall 93v-125).odi opened rq98-008 on may 29, 1998 because of the large number of alleged remedy failures and reports of fuel cross flow on vehicles outside of the recall population.based onthe information received from ford on august 11, september 30, and december 15, 1998, and the increasing trend of remedy failures and out of scope crossflow reports, odi opened ea99-032 on november 4, 1999.the attached engineering analysis closing report fully describes the results of this investigation and reason for closing.the subject vehicles can experience fuel transfer from one tank to the other due to malfunctions in the fuel system.when fuel IS pumped or returned to the non-operating tank (cross flow), the capacity of the non-operating tank can be exceeded, causing fuel to overflow past the filler cap, creating a fire potential.
An engineering analysis closing report IS included.
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
There is no summary currently available
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.