1995 Ford F-250
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Vehicles › Ford › F-250 › 1995
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
These records cover every 1995 Ford F-250. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
4 recalls name the 1995 Ford F-250. Newest first.
On certain trucks equipped with speed control, gasoline or natural gas engines, the speed control deactivation switch may overheat.
Overheating could result in smoke or burn and an underhood fire.
Dealers will install a fused wiring harness into the speed control system free of charge. the recall began on august 7, 2006. owners may contact ford at 1-866-436-7332. (note: also see recalls 05v017 and 05v388)
Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. the recall began on july 1, 2006. owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
On certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles equipped with speed control, the speed control deactivation switch may overheat, smoke, or burn.
A fire at the switch could occur.
By letter dated september 12, 2005, owners were instructed to return their vehicles to their dealers to have the speed control deactivation switch disconnected. owners who have had their speed control deactivated are being notified that parts will be available and advised to make an appointment to reconnect the speed control beginning in february 2006. owners who did not have their speed control deactivated are being notified to have their system remedied beginning in february 2006. owners are urged to avail themselves of the free disconnect service as soon as possible because of the significant risk of fire. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673. (note: also see recalls 05v017 and 06v286)
The wire harness for the power lumbar feature on the seat IS underneath the front seat cushion support wires. the support wires on the driver seat can contact and damage the insulation harness resulting in a high resistance electrical short through the support wires.
Consequence of defect: over heating of the support wires could result, and melting, smoke, or possible igntion of the surrounding materials could occur.
Dealers will inspect the seats on the affected vehicles. If no damage IS found, the driver seat wire harness will be covered with a protective convolute tubing, wrapped with electrical tape and the harness will be rerouted. If damage IS found, the wire harness will be replaced.
Seat back bolts broke while driving vehicle. lost control almost going off road. in motion, two lane highway driving winding road. broke rounding a curve.
TL* the contact owned a 1995 ford F-250. When the vehicle came to a complete stop, the contact noticed flames underneath the hood. The contact sustained hand injuries while attempting to extinguish the fire. Medical attention was not required. The contact discovered that the fire started at the wiring harness. The fire department extinguished the fire. A police report was filed. The vehicle was destroyed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 103,000.
I replaced the rear brakes on my 1995 ford F250. I put on new duralast brake shoes (part #358) from autozone. Afterwards, the emergency/parking brake failed. I took everything apart and took a while before I found the problem. At the top of the brake shoes there IS a half circle where the front and back shoe meets and that IS where the emergency/parking brake cam pushes the shoes apart. The oem shoes have a tall shoulder at the very tip top where the cam pushes against the rear shoe, the duralast shoe has a shorter shoulder and allowed the cam to slip over the top of the rear shoe causing the unexpected emergency/parking brake failure. *Dt
TL* the contact owns a 1994 ford F-250. The contact stated that there was a visible fuel leak. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 130,000.
Driver side seat belts will not retract automatically causing concern belt would fail to work. *tr
1995 ford F250. consumer writes in regards to problems with leaking gas line, brakes, transmission and several other issues with vehicle. Consumer states unsatisfactory customer service from several dealerships. *smd the master cylinder, air pump, brake pads, serpentine belt, brake lines, alternator, cruise control sensor, battery, headlight control and upper switch were all replaced. Also, the starter solenoid switch was replaced, as well as the oil pan, that was rusted. The tires were replaced, due to cracking.
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F-250. The contact stated that the parking brake failed. The contact stated that they were able to drive the vehicle with the parking brake engaged. The vehicle was taken through state inspection and did not pass because the parking brake was inoperable. The contact referenced nhtsa campaign ID number: 02v068000 (parking brake) and was told by the manufacturer that the recall was only for vehicles with manual transmissions. The vehicle was not repaired. The vin was not available. the failure and the current mileage was 202,000. *tr
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F-250. The contact stated that there was a recurring failure with the fly wheel in which the fly-wheel had to be replaced continuously. The failure mileage was 78,955 and the current mileage was 86,760. *tr
1995 ford F250. Consumer states engine stall while driving. *Tgw when the engine stalled, the consumer had to put the shifter into park or neutral and the engine would restart. He also, stated the fuel/water separator was replaced. Also, other repairs included, new hoses, fan clutch, idler wheel, brake pads, relay on glow plug, v-belt, several batteries, the lift pump and the solenoid on the starter. Jb also, the o-rings were replaced. Updated 12/31/12 the dealer found problems with the icp injector press, eba exh back press, map, manifold and ABS. Updated 03/14/13. *Jb
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F-250. The contact stated the vehicle had a dual fuel tank, one in the front and one in the rear. While driving, the front fuel tank began to leak. The vehicle was taken to a private mechanic who diagnosed the failure and stated the check valve inside the fuel tank caused the failure. The dealer stated that in order to perform a diagnostic test the contact had to pay a fee and offered no other assistance. The manufacturer was notified who stated the vehicle was not covered by a warranty and offered no assistance. The failure mileage was 168,000. The current mileage was 170,000.
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F-250. The contact stated while driving 2 mph and attempting to plow snow, the frame of the vehicle bent when contact was made with the snow. The contact exited the vehicle and noticed that the frame was rusted near the front end. The contact attempted to tow the vehicle, but it flattened when it was raised onto the tow truck. The dealer and manufacturer were notified and provided no assistance. The failure mileage was 98,000.
1995 ford F250. Consumer writes in regards to problem with speedometer cluster. *Tgw the consumer stated when he shifted from park to drive, or from neutral to reverse the engine would shut off
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F250. The contact stated that the vehicle caught on fire. The fire originated from the master cylinder. The contact was able to extinguish the fire and the hood, fender walls and wires were destroyed. The manufacturer was contacted and they advised the contact to wait until the legal department contacted him before any repairs were performed. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileage was 140,000. updated 04/15/11*lj updated 12/19/2011 *ln
Engine compartment fire on a parked 1995 ford F-250. The fire spread rapidly throughout the engine compartment, and caused a car parked next to the truck to catch fire. The vehicle IS totaled. The fire investigator for mount prospect, il, indicated that it was likely an internal electrical fault. *Tr
1995 ford F-250 truck caught fire. *Tr
TL* the contact owns a 1995 ford F250. The contact stated he was awakened by the horn of his vehicle independently sounding. The contact then observed flames shooting from the driver's side of the engine compartment. The engine was destroyed and the left side of the engine, including the metal, had melted. The insurance company was contacted. The vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure and current mileages were approximately 133,000.
1998 ford F150 truck (brakes locking whenever fast braking applied, ford F250 same thing truck was wrecked last night due to this problem thanks god no one was killed ! 1997 ford mustang same problem ,brakes lock when fast pressure IS applied . help these vehicles are going to kill somebody . Oh yes and on the F250 we now have a traffic ticket for failure to control speed and the truck IS totaled. *Tr
1995 ford F-250 7.3 powerstroke. Cam position sensor (cps) failure , replaced and truck started , goes bad often , when it does truck dies wont start. Old part IS available. *Tr
My 1995 F250 ford pickup burned up while parked. absolutely no-contact from ford manufacturing since the incident - even after I tried to contact ford on several ocaasions - could get through to phone operator but no response from ford motor co.
1995 ford F250 7.3L turbo diesel : cam position sensor failed after numerous, worsening experiences with erratic engine performance. sensor replaced by dealer on 12/07/2006 with truck barely able to continue running. this corrected the problem at the time, but I am now occasionally experiencing the same symptoms again. I have subsequently discovered that this IS a chronic problem with this navistar engine. many ford vehicles have been recalled as a result, but mine has not, despite numerous vehicles of my model year (1995) experiencing this problem. *tr
Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford F250. the vehicle has fts westlake cr861 tires. the contact stated that his dot number IS included in the recall regarding tread separation. he called fts and they refused to provide assistance. they stated that the boss was on vacation and would not be able to help until he returned. the contact believes that the tires should be repaired as soon as possible. there had been no failure to date. the recall number was unknown. the current mileage was 115,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford F-250. the auto mechanic called on behalf of the contact. the mechanic stated that the vehicle has a defective storage tank assembly. he stated that a fuel pump check valve overflowed from one tank to the other and spilled from the filter cap. he and the contact notified ford and they stated that nothing could be done because recall number 93v125000 (fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly) does not include the vehicle's make and year. ford referenced service recall bulletin number 93s68. the contact paid $607 to have the defective storage tank assembly repaired replacing the electric fuel pump assembly which includes the check valve. the dealer information was unknown. the failure mileage was 174,921 and current mileage was 190,000. updated 09/06/07 *tr
TL*- the contact stated that while parked in the driveway the 1995 ford f 250 with 98000 failure mileage)caught on fire, without any warning. the entire front end, back to the bed caught on fire. there was recall 05v38800) on the 1995 ford F250. the vehicle sustained major damage.
Consumer complaint concerning the recall on his vehicle. *Ts the consumer IS currently away and unable to have the recall (05s28) repair made on the cruise control deactivation switch. the consumer would like to know if the recall work can still be done a year to a year and a half from now. *nm
Dt*: the contact stated in the past two years while driving at any speed with the cruise control engaged, the turn signals deactivated the cruise control. This occurred during half of the incidences of cruise control use. The vehicle was not driven very often therefore it was not taken to the dealer. During a long trip, the vehicle was pulled over by a police officer who indicated the tail lights were not working which included the running and turn signal lights. While testing the emergency flashers, the license plate lights began flashing. Two recalls were observed by the contact, #05v388000 and #06v286000 pertaining to the vehicle speed control. When the dealer was contacted, they determined the vehicle was not included in either recall due to the vin. The manufacturer was also contacted who recommended the contact call the nhtsa. The contact also expressed that the turn signal and the cruise control switch were both located in the steering column within the wiring harness.
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
Ea05-005 IS closed with ford?s actions in recalls 05v-017, 05v-388, and 06v-286, recalling approximately 6.7 million vehicles equipped with texas instruments speed control deactivation switches (scds).the brake systems in these recalled vehicles generate a vacuum that can potentially cause the scds to fail and, in certain switch installation orientations, catch fire.ford IS also including the entire population of 1998 explorers.ford has informed odi that testing to determine the cause of failures in the 1998 explorers will continue after this investigation IS closed.odi believes that the vehicles exhibiting the factors causing scds failure described in this report correlate well with the observed failure rates on these vehicles by model and model year.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the non-recalled vehicles manufactured with scds that are not included in ford?s recalls.odi will continue to monitor the non-recalled population for incidence of engine compartment fires.the agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.see attached closing report for details.
Consumer complaints report that bolts which retain the axle pivot bracket to the frame cross member can loosen or fail, causing the inboard end or the axle to become detached from the vehicle.owners allege that this could result in loss of steering control, however the complaint data shows only one incident where the vehicle left the roadway following axle separation, with no damage to the vehicle.in addition to the 225 consumer complaints, there were 4,315 warranty claims related to the front suspension and members, and 22 vehicles were replaced for goodwill.documents submitted by ford, under request for confidential treatment indicate that the bolts were inadequate for the durability requirements of the vehicle.also, bolts were found to have been inadequately torqued at one or more assembly plants.other factors, such as wax treatment of the frame, contributed to the problem.increased bolt diameter and increased torque apparently corrected the problem.a service bulletin, 96-20-13, was issued to advise dealers of this corrective action.in these documents, ford also reported that a vehicle, equipped for simultaneous catastrophic failure of all pivot bracket fasteners, was evaluated resulting in a slight vehicle pull to one side with no loss of vehicle control.odi has not replicated ford's vehicle testing, however analysis of the design of the front suspension indicates that even if the inboard end of theaxle became disconnected from the frame, the outboard end would remain firmly attached to the leaf spring with two u-bolts.this would retain the wheel in its approximate position, although the wheel alignment would be greatly in error.therefore it IS unlikely that control of the vehicle would be lost.owners reprot many significant noises in the suspension, such as creaking, groaning, clunking, and squeaking, prior to noticing any separation of the axle.this provides warning of the loosening of the bolts to the driver, and should not be ignored.ford has stated that repairs will be covered under the vehicle's bumper warranty.complaints about warranty coverage by a ford dealer should be addressed to ford, or to appropriate state and local agencies.a safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.the agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.