2000 Ford E-350
Safety record from NHTSA: recalls, owner complaints, investigations and service bulletins.
Have the VIN?
Vehicles › Ford › E-350 › 2000
These records cover every 2000 Ford E-350. To see whether one car still needs a recall repair, decode its VIN or check it with NHTSA.
Recalls
8 recalls name the 2000 Ford E-350. Newest first.
Ford IS recalling model years 1995-2003 windstar, 2000-2003 excursion diesel, 1993-1997 and 1999-2003 F-250 sd through F-550 sd diesel, 1992-2003 E-150 through E-550, 1995-2002 explorer, 1997 and 2002 mercury mountaineer, 1995-1997 and 2001-2003 ranger, and 1994 F53 vehicles equipped with the texas instruments speed control deactivation switch (scds). the…
Risk and remedy
Risk
A vehicle fire could occur with or without the engine running.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners that dealers will install a fused wiring harness in line with the scds. on 1999-2003 windstar vehicles with a leaking scds, dealers will also inspect the ABS control module connector and repair as necessary. repairs will be completed free of charge. the safety recall began on october 27, 2009. owners may contact ford at 1-888-222-2751.
Mobilityworks IS recalling 133 my 2005-2006 ford E250, my 2000, 2004-2006 E350, my 2000, 2005 E450, my 2005-2006 GMC 2500, GMC 3500, and my 2006 dodge 2500 vans equipped with ricon platform style wheelchair lifts. these lifts fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 403, "platform lift systems for motor vehicles."…
Risk and remedy
Risk
A lift occupant can be injured should the lift begin to stow unintentionally.
Remedy
Mobilityworks IS working with ricon to correct the wheelchair lifts free of charge (please see 07e097). owners may contact ricon at 1-818-267-3000 or mobilityworks at 1-800-769-8267.
Ford IS recalling 225,000 my 1992-2003 econoline, my 1993-1995 taurus sho, my 1992-1998 crown victoria, my 1993 bronco, f-series, my 1995-1997 f-series super duty stripped chassis, my 1992-1998 mercury grand marquis, and my 1992-1995 lincoln town car vehicles. the affected vehicles were previously repaired using a wiring harness that IS not compatible with…
Risk and remedy
Risk
As a result, the fuse IS located in the output circuit rather than in the intended input power feed circuit, and may not offer the intended protection in the event of an electrical short to ground.
Remedy
Dealers will install a new wiring harness, or replace the mating electrical component. the recall began on february 18, 2008. owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
On certain pickup trucks, passenger vehicles, sport utility vehicles, and motor homes chassis, the speed control deactivation switch may, under certain conditions, leak internally and then overheat, smoke, or burn.
Risk and remedy
Risk
This could result in an underhood fire.
Remedy
Dealers will install a fused wiring harness. owners of the passenger cars included in this campaign will be instructed to return their vehicles to their dealers to have the speed control deactivation switch disconnected as an interim repair. as soon as repair parts are available (expected october 2007), owners will be instructed to return to the dealers for installation of a fused wiring harness. the recall began on august 13, 2007, and mailing completed by september 19, 2007. owners may contact ford at 1-888-222-2751.
On certain vans equipped with sure-lok wheelchair securement systems, the sprocket teeth of the retractor assembly IS out of alignment.
Risk and remedy
Risk
In the event of a vehicle crash, the wheelchair may not be adequately secured possibly resulting in injuries to a wheelchair occupant.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect and replace the wheelchair securement retractors as necessary. sure-lok will handle the repairs for this campaign. owners should contact sure-lock at 1-908-231-1804 or mobilityworks at 1-800-769-8267.
Vehicle description: on certain vans with ambulance prep packages or other severe-duty applications involving operation at or near the gross vehicle weight with frequent twisting of the vehicle body, such as off-road, rough road or speed bump events, the 35 gallon mid-ship fuel tank could develop a crack where it contacts the frame cross member. if the…
Risk and remedy
Risk
Fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect the fuel tank and, if cracked, will replace the tank. insulator pads will be installed on all vehicles to reduce the stress levels in the fuel tank. owner notification began april 19, 2001. owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Vehicle description: bi-fuel CNG pickup trucks and bi-fuel CNG vans, modified by cfi control systems, inc., fail to conform to the requirements of fmvss no. 303, "fuel system integrity of compressed natural gas vehicles." the label affixed to the fuel filler door by the vehicle modifier contains the inspection date and expiration date of the CNG tank.…
Risk and remedy
Risk
These vehicles do not comply with the requirements.
Remedy
Owners will be provided a label with the required statement, along with instructions for affixing the label at the fuel filler door. owner notification began november 2, 2000. owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Vehicle description: cutaways and stripped chassis with single rear wheels. the lug nuts can potentially bottom out on a shoulder on the studs.
Risk and remedy
Risk
If this occurs, there can be an inadequate clamp load to attach the wheel to the axle, resulting in noise, damage to the wheel and hub, or in extreme cases, loss of a rear wheel while the vehicle IS being driven.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the rear wheel attaching studs.
Owner complaints
59 complaints3 involved a crash3 involved a fire16 injuries2 deaths
What owners report most
Latest complaints
- Service brakes · Vehicle speed control
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. While driving 70 mph, the vehicle accelerated without warning. The brake pedal was depressed, but the vehicle failed to decelerate. The contact placed the gear shifter into neutral to stop the vehicle. The contact coasted the vehicle over to the side of the…
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. While driving 70 mph, the vehicle accelerated without warning. The brake pedal was depressed, but the vehicle failed to decelerate. The contact placed the gear shifter into neutral to stop the vehicle. The contact coasted the vehicle over to the side of the road and powered off the engine twice. When the vehicle was restarted, it operated normally and was driven to the contact's residence. In addition, while depressing the brake pedal, smoke appeared from the brake pedal. The vehicle was not taken to a dealer or an independent mechanic for diagnostic testing. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 169,000.
- Engine
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. The contact heard a loud, booming noise from the front of the vehicle. The contact discovered that a spark plug exploded and dislodged from the engine, which shattered the engine coil pack. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The local dealer (tom…
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. The contact heard a loud, booming noise from the front of the vehicle. The contact discovered that a spark plug exploded and dislodged from the engine, which shattered the engine coil pack. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The local dealer (tom holzer ford, 39300 w. 10 mile rd, farmington hills, mi) was notified of the failure. The manufacturer was not notified. The failure mileage was 151,000.
- Engine
The spark plug NO.7 blow out with the ignition coil. *tr
- Vehicle speed control
2000 ford E-350. consumer writes in regards to vehicle fire. *smd the consumer stated the fire damaged his house and the van was destroyed. The consumer believed the cruise control was the cause of the fire. *Jb
- Tires
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E350 equipped with runway enduro ht tires, size LT 225-75-r16 dot number (5wtm0408). The contact stated that upon inspection, it was noticed that the tread on the passenger rear tire was extremely worn and needed to be replaced. The tire was replaced before the…
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E350 equipped with runway enduro ht tires, size LT 225-75-r16 dot number (5wtm0408). The contact stated that upon inspection, it was noticed that the tread on the passenger rear tire was extremely worn and needed to be replaced. The tire was replaced before the steel belts failed. The manufacturer was not notified. The tire mileage was 18,478. The failure mileage was 76,544. ... Updated 02/28/13 *bf the consumer stated the tire was abnormally worn in one spot. The consumer IS in possession of the tire. Updated 03/27/2013 *js
- Fuel system, diesel
My fuel tank interior flaked so severely it caused the engine to buck violently and dramatically loose power. This was caused by the almost complete blockage of the fuel tank pickup screen/filter. since that time I have had to disassemble and thoroughly clean the fuel pickup of the flakes 4 times…
My fuel tank interior flaked so severely it caused the engine to buck violently and dramatically loose power. This was caused by the almost complete blockage of the fuel tank pickup screen/filter. since that time I have had to disassemble and thoroughly clean the fuel pickup of the flakes 4 times including today. Each time the pickup was packed with silver flakes from the deteriorating lining of the fuel tank. the problem occurred each time while trailering my rv down the interstate. It IS extremely scary and the almost complete loss of power makes it very difficult to get to the next exit. the problem IS so persistent that I have put a door in the floor of my van so that I no longer have to drop the tank for access. I purchased this ford E-350 diesel new in 2000. *tr
- Fuel system, diesel
I was driving a ford diesel van north on highway 31 towards pennington, nj, when the truck started acting up. Ultimately, it stalled - right there on the highway; 4 lanes, semi trucks coming around a bend @ 40 + mph, and no shoulder. I told my helper to leave the truck because I was sure we were…
I was driving a ford diesel van north on highway 31 towards pennington, nj, when the truck started acting up. Ultimately, it stalled - right there on the highway; 4 lanes, semi trucks coming around a bend @ 40 + mph, and no shoulder. I told my helper to leave the truck because I was sure we were going to get hit. No way a tractor trailer, at those speeds, could stop in time. Several semi's had to cut off cars in the left lane to avoid us. I thought for sure I was dead. After sweating it out, I finally got the truck started and got to a side street, at about 5 mph. That's when I called aaa & got the truck towed to my ford dealer, where they want $2500 to repair what they call " fuel tank delamination". I never heard of such a thing and neither did anyone I spoke with in the auto repair industry so I googled it: ford diesel fuel tank problems, and as it turns out, there are thousands of vehicles out there with the exact same problem. I"m surprised no one has died yet, but I guess that's what it will take, maybe when a couple of kids die, ford will do something about it, if it doesn't cost too much - of course. To alleviate this "problem," the ford dealer IS, in effect, going to replace the entire fuel delivery system, at the consumers cost. New fuel tank, new fuel transfer pump, clean out the fuel lines, replace fuel filter, clean injectors, so, bend over. ps really hope nobody has to die - but that's your call. *Tr
- Engine and engine cooling
2000 ford V8 triton engine spark plug popped out and engine misfire had the coil replaced and had mechanic tap out the spark plug hole and re set the plug and then it happened again on saturday july 3RD 2010. *Tr
- Fuel system, diesel
Ford E350 7.3 liter diesel van - having intermittent problems with power and bogging down and at times dying. dropped the fuel tank and fond paint flakes from the tank delaminating. having to replace the tank and hoping there IS no further damage already done. *Tr
- Fuel system, other
I have a 2000 ford E350 that started running rough and eventually lost power on the freeway when it was needed I did'nt know what happening to the vehicle it just started sputtering and spewing thick smoke out of the tail pipe. I limped the van to the dealetship and after all diagnosis and…
I have a 2000 ford E350 that started running rough and eventually lost power on the freeway when it was needed I did'nt know what happening to the vehicle it just started sputtering and spewing thick smoke out of the tail pipe. I limped the van to the dealetship and after all diagnosis and replacement of certain fuel parts was said and done it was a clogged fuel sending unit due to a rusty fuel tank caused by delamination of the lining inside the tank. These particals of delamination and the rust of the exposed metal of the tank caused the sending unit to be clogged to the point of replacement, the sending unit alone was over $600.00 of the $1600.00 bill, it was explained to me that the problem of the clogged fuel sending unit will happening again in about a year due to the tank failing. I am very concerned with losing power again and not being able to get off the road on a major freeway and spewing the big cloud smoke out the tail pipe when this happens again and possibly blinding the drivers behind me. I spoke with the dealer, I was advised that the tanks are made of plastic now to avoid/fix this problem. I spoke with ford motor corp., they stated that my vehicle was out of warrany and they would not cover this unvoidable problem. I have taken very good care of this vehicle, it IS a service vehicle for my company and when it IS down I do not make any money. I do everything I can to perform the prevenitive maintenance, there IS nothing I could have done to avoid this safety issue, ford knows the problem/safety issue IS there and did not want to help out at all. After all the research that I have done since paying the bill at the dealership I am very disappointed to hear what others are going through and the routes they are taking to try to get the problem resolved, this why I have wriiten you this letter. *Tr
- Vehicle speed control › Cruise control
TL* the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. He received recall notice # 08v051000 (vehicle speed control:cruise control). The vehicle was not repaired since an authoried technician could not provide an estimate on when the parts would be available. The failure mileage 203,304
- Electrical system
Tl*the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. the contact received a recall notice in august of 2007 for the electrical system. the vehicle was taken to a local authorized dealer for repair in november of 2007, but the mechanic stated that there was no recall replacement part available. the contact was…
Tl*the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. the contact received a recall notice in august of 2007 for the electrical system. the vehicle was taken to a local authorized dealer for repair in november of 2007, but the mechanic stated that there was no recall replacement part available. the contact was consistently calling the dealer to see if the part had arrived, but was informed again that the part had not been manufactured and to call back later. The contact has become very discouraged and does not know if the recall part will ever be manufactured by ford. he was under the assumption that all the vehicles included in the recall needed the part to warrant the repair service. there had been no failure to date. updated 6/16/08 *cn
- Engine and engine cooling › Engine
Second time spark plug has blown out of the head, once each side. $3500 repair first time. We'll see on this one. *tr
- Vehicle speed control
Tl*the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. the contact received a recall notice for the vehicle speed control. she took the vehicle to the dealer in august of 2007 and the cruise control was deactivated. since that time, she has been waiting for the recall repair to be performed; however, she has…
Tl*the contact owns a 2000 ford E-350. the contact received a recall notice for the vehicle speed control. she took the vehicle to the dealer in august of 2007 and the cruise control was deactivated. since that time, she has been waiting for the recall repair to be performed; however, she has been given four different dates as to when the part would be available. there had been no failure to date. the current mileage was 42,000. updated 4/21/08 *cn
- Electrical system › Wiring
Ford has a recall #08s01 on their fused jumper harness .we are a church with two vehicles that are needing this recall. The local dealer metro ford in tupelo mississippi has not had this part for three months and has not idea when it will come into their shop. Do you have any information on this subject. Can you help me with issue? Paul *tr
- Fuel system, diesel › Storage › Tank assembly
7.3 liter diesel engine stalling. Fuel pump and fuel filter replaced;fuel tank removed and cleaned; silver paint flakes were found blocking the fuel pickup. Tank was re-installed and problem re-occurred within 100 miles. Van was taken to local ford dealership and tank was removed again. Silver…
7.3 liter diesel engine stalling. Fuel pump and fuel filter replaced;fuel tank removed and cleaned; silver paint flakes were found blocking the fuel pickup. Tank was re-installed and problem re-occurred within 100 miles. Van was taken to local ford dealership and tank was removed again. Silver paint flakes were found blocking the fuel pickup line again. The service technician determined that the fuel tank liner was de-laminating, and the fuel tank needed replacing. I have the defective tank in my possession. This was a dangerous defect that caused engine stalling in heavy traffic, endangering myself and other motorists behind and beside me. This was also an expensive and time consuming repair, resulting in loss of use and rental expenses. *tr
- Engine and engine cooling
I have a 200 ford E-350. At 130,000 miles the spark plug blew out of number 8 cylinder. And broke the coil pack. Then blew out again at 155,000 mile and now has taken the threads with it. The engine must be pulled, in which will result in a huge bill for me. ford should be made to recall this problem they have with many of there engines. *tr
- Power train › Automatic transmission › Lever and linkage › Column shift
Parked truck in my driveway,went in to eat lunch,came out found truck rolled down driveway,crossed the road on to my neighbors lawn where it hit a tree and did extensive damage to front of truck. *Jb
- Fuel system, diesel › Storage › Tank assembly
2000 ford E-350 econoline diesel serial [xxx] was subject to recall due to leaking diesel fuel from 35 gal. Tank. ford claims recall was performed for previous owner. tank IS leaking again. repair was not suffecient to elimiate failure. Mileage at second leakage 99,000 to present. *js information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(B)(6)
- Engine and engine cooling › Engine › Gasoline
2000-Ford E-350 spark plug blew right out of the aluminum head. *nm
- Electrical system › Wiring › Interior/under dash
Electrical fire under the hood while parked in my driveway. *nm
- Engine and engine cooling
E350 driving on hwy spark plug blew out. I own 3 fords, it has happened to two of them. this van @100,000 miles and my 2001 excursion @ 51000 miles traveling @ 25 mph.
- Engine and engine cooling › Engine
Spark plug blowout. *nm
- Suspension › Front
Spring seat in front suspension was cracking. mechanic had front end of ambulance frame welded so we could continue to use the vehicle.
- Suspension › Front
Spring seat in front suspension was cracking. mechanic had front end of ambulance frame welded so we could continue to use the vehicle.
Defect investigations
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened these reviews into vehicles including this one.
- HVAC Switch Failures
This investigation was opened based on one complaint and reports from four transportation fleets alleging 182 blower motor control switch failures.ODI was concerned that these melting and burning switches could lead to an open flame that could spread throughout the vehicle.After a comprehensive review of all data…
This investigation was opened based on one complaint and reports from four transportation fleets alleging 182 blower motor control switch failures.ODI was concerned that these melting and burning switches could lead to an open flame that could spread throughout the vehicle.After a comprehensive review of all data related to overheating blower motor control switches in the subject vehicles, ODI did not identify the existence of a safety defect trend.ODI reviewed 1,036 complaints, claims, and field reports of failed blower motor control switches and determined that only two fires were likely to have been caused by a failing subject blower motor control switch.This represents a failure rate of 0.2 R/100K on a population of 1,076,975 vehicles that have been in service for up to 14 years.ODI has found that when the subject switches do fail and begin to melt, they are constructed in a manner that typically prevents the failing switch from igniting and developing into an open flame.Ford Motor Company has agreed to take two actions to further reduce the likelihood an overheated blower motor switch in the subject vehicles.Ford informed ODI that it has implemented a series of design changes to the subject switch that will help prevent it from developing internal high resistance short circuits.Ford has also informed ODI that it would release a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB-11-11-21) instructing subject vehicle owners to replace the electrical connector at the same time a failed switch is replaced.In light of the low rate of failure resulting in open flame and fire spread on the subject vehicles, and Ford's actions to reduce the likelihood of a switch failure through switch design changes and a TSB, further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that no safety-related defect exists.The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be reviewed at www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchNHTSAID under the following (ODI) numbers: 10427875, 10114393, 10257890For additional information, see the attached closing report.
- HVAC Switch Failures
ODI has received 1 complaint and reports from 4 transportation fleets alleging 182 switch failures.Each fleet operates mini buses built on a Ford E350 or E450 cutaway chassis.The OEM HVAC blower switches have melted, smoked, burned or experienced open flame and become inoperable on vehicles in each fleet.Some drivers…
ODI has received 1 complaint and reports from 4 transportation fleets alleging 182 switch failures.Each fleet operates mini buses built on a Ford E350 or E450 cutaway chassis.The OEM HVAC blower switches have melted, smoked, burned or experienced open flame and become inoperable on vehicles in each fleet.Some drivers have reported a burning smell or smoke coming from the dash.One fleet reported a vehicle fire.No injuries were sustained.However, the bus was carrying special needs children when the driver noticed smoke coming from the dash.The driver was able to evacuate the children prior to the vehicle becoming engulfed in flames.This PE has been upgraded to an Engineering Analysis (EA) to determine if the blower motor switch failures create a situation where a vehicle fire is possible and presents a safety risk to the driver and other passengers.
- Spark plug ejection from cylinder head
On september 6, 2005, odi received a petition requesting that the agency investigate allegations of engine spark plug ejection in certain model year 1997 through 2004 ford vehicles with triton V-8 and V-10 engines.odi received a total of 474 non-duplicative complaints on the subject vehicles where the complainant, or…
On september 6, 2005, odi received a petition requesting that the agency investigate allegations of engine spark plug ejection in certain model year 1997 through 2004 ford vehicles with triton V-8 and V-10 engines.odi received a total of 474 non-duplicative complaints on the subject vehicles where the complainant, or the dealer repairing the vehicle, reported that a spark plug detached from the cylinder and/or ejected from the engine.as of december 8, 2005, odi IS not aware of any allegations where the alleged defect resulted in a loss of vehicle control, a crash, an injury, or a fatality in any of the 10,319,810 subject vehicles.in addition, odi IS aware of only two incidents where the vehicle stalled without restart.information contained in the odi consumer complaints and obtained from 72 telephone interviews with complainants showed the following:(1) 99% of the complaints were on my 1997 to 2002 subject vehicles.(2) most the complainants reported hearing a loud pop while driving or upon starting up the vehicle followed by a loud, repetitive clicking or popping sound.(3) many of the complainants reported that the popping sound was accompanied by some loss of vehicle power; however, in 99% of the incidents reported, the vehicle did not stall.in the very few incidents where the vehicle did stall, most vehicles could be restarted.(4) only a small percentage of the complainants cited that they smelled gas or a slight burning smell when the incident occurred.(5) in all but a very few incidents, vehicle damage was limited to the engine.in one incident, the complaint reported that the fuel rail was damaged and replaced after one of the spark plugs ejected from the engine; however, the complainant reported that the damage did not result in any type of fuel leak or fire.in another incident, the only incident where a fire was alleged, the complainant reported that no fluid leak was observed, but that a fire resulted after the spark plug had ejected from the engine and he had restarted the vehicle and driven to another location.none of the complainants reported any damage to the vehicle hood.(6) only two complainants reported that they observed what appeared to be some drops of fuel coming from the cylinder where the spark plug had failed or on the spark plug itself; however, each of these complainants reported that there was no smoke or flames as a result of his incident.as the petitioner noted, and odi?s analysis showed, it IS possible for a spark plug to detach from the engine cylinder threads in the subject vehicles.however, odi?s analysis of 474 complaints describing such incidents found only a very few alleged any safety-related consequences.none of these showed any evidence of a serious safety consequence.given the large population and relatively long exposure time of the subject vehicles, the complaint analysis indicates that the risk to motor vehicle safety from the alleged defect IS very low.in view of the foregoing, it IS unlikely that nhtsa would issue an order for the notification and remedy of the alleged defect at the conclusion of the investigation requested in the petition.therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize nhtsa?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency?s safety mission, the petition IS denied.
- Rapid tire deflation
This investigation was opened on certain ford pickup trucks and vans to evaluate the effects of a valve stem ejection (with rapid air loss) and a slow leaking valve stem on vehicle handing.during the investigation, odi evaluated over 1,100 complaints and warranty claims, conducted vehicle dynamic testing on a subject…
This investigation was opened on certain ford pickup trucks and vans to evaluate the effects of a valve stem ejection (with rapid air loss) and a slow leaking valve stem on vehicle handing.during the investigation, odi evaluated over 1,100 complaints and warranty claims, conducted vehicle dynamic testing on a subject vehicle with the failure mode replicated, interviewed owners, and examined complaint vehicles in the field.the results of the test program indicates the effect of a valve stem ejection on these vehicles IS easily controlled. Further, with a population of almost 900,000 vehicles, having two to four years of exposure, odi IS aware of only 3 minor crashes and IS unaware of any injuries.the small number of crashes relative to the large population of vehicles IS consistent with the testing which was performed. Therefore, this investigation IS closed.see the attached report for full technical details.
Service bulletins
Technical service bulletins and other communications the manufacturer sent dealers about this vehicle. Ask a dealer for the full document by its number.
- 10148820This SKU is a front upper ball joint. The Customer communication requested return of unsold inventory to inspect for ball studs with excessive rotational friction in the ball joint assembly. Excessive friction in the ball joint assembly may cause a perceptible increase in steering effort.
- 10022675Brake booster system may exhibit a brake pedal kickback and/or grabbing condition when applying the brakes.
- 10022232Headlight adjustment needed.
- 10018941Vibration/harshness above 45 mph (72 km/h) after tire balance.
- 10017865Headlight adjustment - chassis cab incomplete vehicles.
- 10013298Cracks in the left or right spring tower flange. Spring tower weld repair and replacement procedure.
- 10010743Intermittent clunk on 3-2 downshift during coastdown/tip-in. Oasis. To include 2005 F-150, e-series and expedition.
- 10007350Clunk from front suspension.
- 10004072A bump steer steering feeling, noted when the vehicle's front wheels/tires contact road surface irregularities.
- 10002783Rough idle and/or hesitation when acclerating on certain super duty vehicles equipped with a 5.4L or 6.8L engine.
- 637767Subject regarding early wear of the inner brake pad on the rear disc brakes.
- 637519Some vehicles equipped with 4r70w transmission (driveshaft >70 inch) may exhibit a vibration / roughness on acceleration or under load at about 50-55 mph.
- 636252Some vehicles equipped with a 5.4L engine / 4r100 transmission federal emissions powertrain may exhibit a rough idle and / or hesitation when accelerating.
- 630683Concerns with bump steer steering feeling noted when front wheels / tires contact road surface irregularities.
- 630150Some vehicles without front brake dust shields may exhibit premature wear of the front wheel bearings.
- 624689Some vehicles may exhibit a fuel fill valve sealing condition.
- 622802Some vehicles equipped with 4r70w transmission (driveshaft >70 inch) may exhibit a driveline vibration / roughness on acceleration or under load at about 50 - 55 mph.
- 622744Some cut-away vehicles may exhibit anti-skid brake system diagnostic trouble code c1229, c1230 and c1237.
- 620986Subject regarding overview of bi-fuel CNG vehicle parameter identification data (pid), inputs and outputs as a diagnostic aid for bi-fuel vehicles.
- 620283Information pertaining to vehicles exhibiting damage to the lower rear brake caliper boots when the vehicle IS driven extensively on gravel surfaces.
- 620226Some vehicles built before feburary 15, 2001 may exhibit a constant squealing sound from the front wheels while driving. This may be caused by excessive side to side travel of the anti-rattle clip on the front brake caliper adaptor face.
- 619476Some cutaways equipped with single rear wheels (only) may exhibit early rear brake wear when operated in muddy or slushy conditions even after following ssm 14576 (install rear brake dust shield assemblies).
- 617963Some vehicles may exhibit early wear of the inner brake pad on the rear disc brakes, if used in mud, slush, dirt, or other severe conditions.
- 613574Some vehicles may exhibit damage to the lower rear brake caliber boots when the vehicle IS used extensively on gravel surfaces. **Mr
- 612791Vehicles without front dust shields may exhibit premature wear of the front wheel bearings due to damaged inner wheel bearing seals. *Mjs
- 612667Some vehicles may exhibit damage to the lower rear brake caliper boots when the vehicle IS driven extensively on gravel surfaces.
- 612481Some vehicles may exhibit damage to the lower rear brake caliper boots when the vehicle IS driven extensively on gravel surfaces.
- 612290Without front brake dust shields may exhibit premature wear of the front wheel bearings due to damaged inner wheel bearing seals.
Every Ford E-350 model year
Bars are owner complaints, dots mark years with recalls. Select a year to open its report.